Paul Hupp et al v. City of Beaumont et al
Filing
153
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) defendant Jack Huntsman's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 141) is granted; (2) plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication (docket no. 135) is consequently denied as moot; and (3) Judgment will be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (lwag)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL HUPP, et al.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
CITY OF BEAUMONT, et al.,
15
16
Defendants.
___________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. ED CV 14-1303-VAP (SP)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended
19 Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States
20 Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those
21 portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the
22 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
23 //
24 //
25
26
27
28
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) defendant Jack Huntsman’s Motion to
2 Dismiss (docket no. 141) is granted; (2) plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment or
3 summary adjudication (docket no. 135) is consequently denied as moot; and (3)
4 Judgment will be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
5
6 DATED: November 15, 2017_
7
_________________________________
HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?