Eddie Campos, et al. v. County of Riverside, et al.

Filing 66

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Joint APPLICATION for Order for Protective Order 65 The parties are advised that the Court declines to issue the proposed protective order to which they have stipulated for the reasons stated (See Order) (dts)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 14-1370-JGB (KKx)

Date: August 20, 2015

Title: Eddie Campos, et al. v. County of Riverside, et al.
DOCKET ENTRY
PRESENT:

HON. KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Deb Taylor
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:

None present

n/a
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

The parties’ proposed Stipulation and Protective Order has been referred by the
District Judge to the Magistrate Judge for consideration. The parties are advised that
the Court declines to issue the proposed protective order to which they have
stipulated for the following reasons:
1.

Proposed ¶ 11 needs to be revised to make clear that any
motion seeking relief for violation of the proposed
Protective Order must be brought in strict compliance with
Local Rules 37-1 and 37-2 (including the Joint Stipulation
requirement).

The parties are further directed to the Court’s sample stipulated protective
order located on the Court’s website for a sample of the format of an approved
stipulated protective order. The parties are strongly encouraged to use the language
contained in the approved stipulated protective order.

cc:

Judge Jesus G. Bernal

MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN

Initials of Deputy Clerk_dts