Esther Alvarado et al v. Nationstar Mortgage et al

Filing 9

ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow, re Order, 8 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ESTHER ALVARADO, et al,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, et )
al,
)
)
Defendants. )
)

Case No. EDCV 14-1387-DTB
ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING
ACTION FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

17
18

Plaintiffs filed this pro se civil rights action on July 8, 2014. Under Federal

19 Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), service of the summons and complaint must be
20 accomplished on each named defendant within 120 days after the filing of the
21 complaint. The 120-day period within which to accomplish service on each named
22 defendant expired on November 5, 2014. On November 14, 2014, the Court issued
23 an Order to Show Cause ordering plaintiffs to show good cause as to why service was
24 not made within the 120-day period and why this case should not be dismissed
25 without prejudice for want of prosecution. To date, plaintiffs have not responded in
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
1

1 any way to the Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED
2 without prejudice.
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5 DATED:

January 12, 2015

6
7
8

___________________________________
DAVID T. BRISTOW
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2