Adam Ellis v. Worldwide Capital Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 62

JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, in favor of plaintiff/counter-defendant Adam Ellis against defendants/counter-claimants Worldwide Capital Holdings, Inc., Worldwide Technology Group, and LLC, Nicholas Henkels in the principal amount of $60,000.00, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $60,000.00. Related to: Notice (Other) 58 . (mrgo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION
ADAM ELLIS, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
WORLDWIDE CAPITAL
HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware
corporation; WORLDWIDE
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company;
NICHOLAS HENKELS, an individual;
MICHELLE HENKELS, an individual;
and DOES 1 – 10, inclusive,
Defendants

Case No.: 5:14−cv−01427−JGB−KK
JUDGMENT ENTERED UNDER
RULE 68
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 68)

Complaint Filed: July 11, 2014

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

WORLDWIDE CAPITAL
HOLDINGS, INC.; WORLDWIDE
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC; and
NICHOLAS HENKELS;
Counter-claimants,
v.
ADAM ELLIS,
Counter-defendant.

1
Ellis v. Worldwide Capital Holdings, Inc., et al.
- JUDGMENT ENTERED UNDER RULE 68 -

1

On September 30, 2015, Defendants/Counter-Claimants WORLDWIDE

2

CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., WORLDWIDE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC, and

3

NICHOLAS HENKELS served an Offer of Judgment pursuant to Rule 68(a) of the

4

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On October 1, 2015, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

5

ADAM ELLIS served Defendants/Counter-Claimants with a Notice of Acceptance

6

of Offer of Judgment and a Declaration of Service. Therefore, under the provision of

7

Rule 68,

8

IT IS ADJUDGED THAT:

9

1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ADAM ELLIS shall have judgment against

10
11

Defendants’/Counter-Claimants’ WORLDWIDE CAPITAL HOLDINGS,

12

INC., WORLDWIDE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC, and NICHOLAS

13

HENKELS in the sum of $60,000;

14

2. All claims asserted by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ADAM ELLIS against

15
16

Defendants/Counter-Claimants WORLDWIDE CAPITAL HOLDINGS,

17

INC., WORLDWIDE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC, and NICHOLAS

18

HENKELS are dismissed with prejudice; and

19

3. All claims asserted by Defendants/Counter-Claimants WORLDWIDE

20
21

CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., WORLDWIDE TECHNOLOGY GROUP,

22

LLC, and NICHOLAS HENKELS against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

23

ADAM ELLIS are dismissed with prejudice.

24
25
26
27

November 3,
Date: ____________________, 2015

__________________________
__________________________
_
_
_
The Honorable Jesus G. Bernal
Honorable Jesus G.
s
d States
United States District Judge

28
2
Ellis v. Worldwide Capital Holdings, Inc., et al.
- JUDGMENT ENTERED UNDER RULE 68 -