Guadalupe Ionescu v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court's Order. (See Order for complete details) (afe)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

ED CV14-01446-AS

Title

Guadalupe Ionescu v. Carolyn W Colvin

Present: The
Honorable

Date

January 21, 2015

Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge
Alma Felix

N/A

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner:

Attorneys Present for Respondent:

N/A

N/A

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On July 21, 2014, Plaintiff Guadalupe Ionescu filed a Complaint benefits (Docket Entry No. 3). On
July 23, 2014, the Court issued an “Order re: Procedures in Social Security Case” (Docket Entry No. 7),
requiring Plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment no later than 30 days from the service of
Defendant’s responsive pleading and the administrative record. On November 26, 2014, Defendant filed
an Answer to the Complaint and the Certified Administrative Record (Docket Entry Nos. 12-14). Therefore,
Plaintiff was required to file a Motion for Summary Judgment no later than December 26, 2014. To date,
Plaintiff has failed to file a motion for summary judgment as required by the Court’s July 23, 2014 Order
or request an extension of time to do so.
Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this
Order, why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply
with the Court’s Order. Alternatively, Plaintiff may discharge this Order to Show Cause by filing a motion
for summary judgment or remand no later than noon on February 4, 2015 (with a courtesy copy delivered
directly to Magistrate Judge Sagar’s chambers on the Ninth Floor of the Courthouse at 312 N. Spring Street,
Los Angeles, California 90012). If Plaintiff timely files her motion, the Court will consider it to be a
satisfactory response to this Order to Show Cause and vacate the Order. The dates set forth in the CMO will
be extended accordingly.
Plaintiff is admonished that her failure to satisfactorily respond to this Order will result in a
recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to
comply with the Court’s Orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1