Jeffrey Scott Lind v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 25

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 24 .IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY-SIX dollars and 41/CENTS ($4,466.41), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel as set forth in the stipulation. (mr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Manuel D. Serpa, Calif. Bar No. 174182 LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C. 770 The City Drive South Suite 2000 Orange, CA 92868 Phone (714) 564-8644 Fax (714) 940-0311 Email: manuel.serpa@binderlawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Scott Lind 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 JEFFREY SCOTT LIND, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. EDCV 14-1474 SS ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY-SIX dollars and 41/CENTS ($4,466.41), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel as set forth in the stipulation. 25 26 27 Dated: 8/26/15 /S/ SUZANNE H. SEGAL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?