AMP Tree Service, Inc. v. United States of America
Filing
33
JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The defendant's motion for judgment came on for hearing before the Court, the Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew, United States District Judge, presiding. After carefully considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, all matters properly a part of the record, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Plaintiff Amp Tree Service, Inc., is not entitled to a refund of federal income taxes for the year 2006; and 2. Plaintiff Amp Tree Service, Inc., takes nothing by its complaint. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jre) Modified on 6/22/2015 (jre). Mailed to AMP Tree Service, Inc. 202 N. Loma Pl, Upland, CA 91786.
7
STEPHANIE YONEKURA
Acting United States Attorney
SANDRA R. BROWN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
THOMAS D. COKER (SBN 136820)
Assistant United States Attorney
Federal Building, Suite 7211
300 North Los Angeles Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-2454
Facsimile: (213) 894-0015
E-mail: Thomas.coker@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendant United States of America
1
2
3
4
5
6
JS-6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION
11
12
AMP TREE SERVICE, Inc., a California
Corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No. EDCV 14-01556-RSWL(RZx)
SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
16
Defendant.
17
18
The defendant’s motion for judgment came on for hearing before the Court, the Honorable
19
20
Ronald S.W. Lew, United States District Judge, presiding.
After carefully considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, all
21
22
matters properly a part of the record, and good cause appearing therefor,
23
24
25
26
//
27
//
28
//
-1-
1
2
3
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendant’s motion for
summary judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
1.
Plaintiff Amp Tree Service, Inc., is not entitled to a refund of federal income taxes for
5
6
7
8
the year 2006; and
2.
Plaintiff Amp Tree Service, Inc., takes nothing by its complaint.
DATED: 6/22/2015
RONALD S.W. LEW
_________________________________
RONALD S.W. LEW
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Presented By:
21
STEPHANIE YONEKURA
Acting United States Attorney
SANDRA R. BROWN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
22
23
24
25
26
_______/s/__________________
THOMAS D. COKER
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the United States
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?