AMP Tree Service, Inc. v. United States of America

Filing 33

JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The defendant's motion for judgment came on for hearing before the Court, the Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew, United States District Judge, presiding. After carefully considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, all matters properly a part of the record, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Plaintiff Amp Tree Service, Inc., is not entitled to a refund of federal income taxes for the year 2006; and 2. Plaintiff Amp Tree Service, Inc., takes nothing by its complaint. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jre) Modified on 6/22/2015 (jre). Mailed to AMP Tree Service, Inc. 202 N. Loma Pl, Upland, CA 91786.

Download PDF
7 STEPHANIE YONEKURA Acting United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division THOMAS D. COKER (SBN 136820) Assistant United States Attorney Federal Building, Suite 7211 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2454 Facsimile: (213) 894-0015 E-mail: Thomas.coker@usdoj.gov 8 Attorneys for Defendant United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 JS-6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 AMP TREE SERVICE, Inc., a California Corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No. EDCV 14-01556-RSWL(RZx) SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 Defendant. 17 18 The defendant’s motion for judgment came on for hearing before the Court, the Honorable 19 20 Ronald S.W. Lew, United States District Judge, presiding. After carefully considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, all 21 22 matters properly a part of the record, and good cause appearing therefor, 23 24 25 26 // 27 // 28 // -1- 1 2 3 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Plaintiff Amp Tree Service, Inc., is not entitled to a refund of federal income taxes for 5 6 7 8 the year 2006; and 2. Plaintiff Amp Tree Service, Inc., takes nothing by its complaint. DATED: 6/22/2015 RONALD S.W. LEW _________________________________ RONALD S.W. LEW United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Presented By: 21 STEPHANIE YONEKURA Acting United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division 22 23 24 25 26 _______/s/__________________ THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?