Myung Choi v. Aurora Wolfgang et al.

Filing 53

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani re Notice (Other), 52 . (iva)

Download PDF
1 JUAN HONG (SBN 234046) jhong48@gmail.com 2 LAW OFFICES OF JUAN HONG, ALC 4199 Campus Drive, Suite 550 3 Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: 949-509-6505 4 Facsimile: 949-335-6647 5 Attorney for Plaintiff MYUNG CHOI 6 SANDRA L. McDONOUGH (SBN 193308) smcdonough@paulplevin.com 7 CORRIE J. KLEKOWSKI (SBN 251338) cklekowski@paulplevin.com 8 KEVIN M. BROWN (SBN 306698) kbrown@paulplevin.com 9 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP 10 101 West Broadway, Ninth Floor San Diego, California 92101-8285 11 Telephone: 619-237-5200 Facsimile: 619-615-0700 12 Attorneys for Defendants BOARD OF 13 TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, AURORA 14 WOLFGANG, TERRI J. NELSON, MARIA ANTONIETA GALLEGOS15 RUIZ, ARTURO FERNANDEZGIBERT, ERI YASUHARA, RISA 16 DICKSON, and ANDREW BODMAN 17 (CAPTION CONTINUED ON NEXT 18 PAGE) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:15 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 4 5 MYUNG CHOI, Plaintiff, 6 7 v. 8 AURORA WOLFGANG, TERRI J. NELSON, MARIA ANTONIETA 9 GALLEGOS-RUIZ, ARTURO FERNANDEZ-GIBERT, ERI 10 YASUHARA, RISA DICKSON, AND ANDREW BODMAN, DOES 1 11 THROUGH 10, Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) LEAD CASE NUMBER [Consolidated With Case No. 2:14-cv-08337 VAP (DTBx)] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Judge: Hon. Virginia A. Phillips Mag. Judge: Hon. Shashi Kewalramani Courtroom: 3, Riverside EXEMPT FROM FEES GOVT. CODE § 6103 MYUNG CHOI, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 17 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve 3 production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special 4 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 5 prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 6 stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the proposed Protective Order. The 7 parties acknowledge that this Stipulation and proposed Protective Order does not 8 confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 9 protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 10 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 11 legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, 12 below, that this Stipulation and proposed Protective Order does not entitle them to 13 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 14 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 15 seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 16 B. 17 This action is likely to involve personal and academic review information for GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 18 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other 19 than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such information consists of, among 20 other things, confidential research and internal dialogue regarding performance and 21 evaluation information related to California State University, San Bernardino, 22 deliberative processes and tenure evaluations, confidential financial information, 23 employee personnel files, information regarding confidential academic review 24 practices, other information implicating privacy rights of third parties, information 25 otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or 26 otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case 27 decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to 28 facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 1 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep 2 confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of 3 such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling 4 at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 5 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information 6 will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so 7 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 8 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public 9 record of this case. 10 2. DEFINITIONS 11 2.1 Action: This pending federal law suit. 12 2.2 Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the 13 designation of information or items under this Order. 14 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of 15 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 16 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 17 the Good Cause Statement. 18 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 19 their support staff). 20 2.5 Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information or 21 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 22 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless 24 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 25 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 26 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 27 / / / 28 / / / PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 2.7 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 2 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 3 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 4 2.8 House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 5 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 6 counsel. 7 2.9 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, 8 or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 9 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a 10 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 11 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 12 which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 13 2.11 Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 14 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 15 support staffs). 16 2.12 Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 17 Discovery Material in this Action. 18 2.13 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation 19 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 20 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 21 and their employees and subcontractors. 22 2.14 Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 23 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.15 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 25 Material from a Producing Party. 26 3. SCOPE 27 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Protective Order cover not 28 only Protected Material (as defined above) but also: (1) any information copied or Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 3 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries or 2 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations or 3 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 4 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 5 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 6 4. DURATION 7 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 8 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 9 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be 10 deemed to be the later of: (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, 11 with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and 12 exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials or reviews of this Action, 13 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time 14 pursuant to applicable law. 15 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 16 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 17 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under 18 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 19 qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for 20 protection only those parts of material, documents, items or oral or written 21 communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 22 items or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 23 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 24 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 25 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 26 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or 27 to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the 28 Designating Party to sanctions. PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it 2 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 3 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 4 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 5 this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise 6 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 7 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 8 produced. 9 10 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: a. for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic 11 documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 12 proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each 13 page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on 14 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 15 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 16 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for 17 inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 18 indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection 19 and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be 20 deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 21 documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which 22 documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, 23 before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 24 “CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a 25 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 27 markings in the margins). 28 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP b. for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial proceedings, Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 5 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, 2 hearing or other proceeding, all protected testimony. 3 c. for information produced in some form other than documentary 4 and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place 5 on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is 6 stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the 7 information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent 8 practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s). 9 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 10 failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive 11 the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. 12 Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable 13 efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this 14 Order. 15 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 16 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 17 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s 18 Scheduling Order. 19 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute 20 resolution process under Local Rule 37.1, et seq. 21 6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on 22 the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper 23 purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other 24 parties), may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating 25 Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall 26 continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is 27 entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the 28 challenge. PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 6 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 2 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 3 disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this 4 case only for prosecuting, defending or attempting to settle this litigation or the 5 related state court litigation, Choi v. Board of Trustees of the California State 6 University, California Superior Court Case No. BC554054. Such Protected Material 7 may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions 8 described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party 9 must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 10 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 11 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 12 authorized under this Order. 13 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 14 otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 15 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 16 “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 17 a. the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, 18 as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably 19 necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; 20 b. the officers, directors and employees (including House Counsel) 21 of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; 22 c. Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to 23 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 24 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 25 d. the Court and its personnel; 26 e. court reporters and their staff; 27 f. professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and 28 Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 7 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit 2 A); 3 g. the author or recipient of a document containing the information 4 or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; 5 h. during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, 6 in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the 7 deposing party requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit 1 hereto; 8 and (2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they 9 sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless 10 otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the Court. Pages of 11 transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected 12 Material may be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to 13 anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and 14 i. any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting 15 personnel, mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement 16 discussions. 17 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED 18 IN OTHER LITIGATION 19 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation 20 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as 21 “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: 22 a. promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such 23 notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 24 b. promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or 25 order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 26 subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include 27 a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and 28 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP c. cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 8 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. 2 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with 3 the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this 4 action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the Court from which the 5 subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s 6 permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking 7 protection in that court of its confidential material, and nothing in these provisions 8 should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action 9 to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 10 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE 11 PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION 12 a. The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced 13 by a Non-Party in this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such 14 information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected 15 by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions 16 should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. 17 b. In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, 18 to produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is 19 subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s 20 confidential information, then the Party shall: 21 i. promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the 22 Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a 23 confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party; 24 ii. promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the 25 Stipulated Protective Order in this action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a 26 reasonably specific description of the information requested; and 27 iii. make the information requested available for inspection by 28 the Non-Party, if requested. PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 9 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 c. If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this Court 2 within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving 3 Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the 4 discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving 5 Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to 6 the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the 7 Court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and 8 expense of seeking protection in this Court of its Protected Material. 9 10. 10 UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 11 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 12 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately: (a) notify in 13 writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures; (b) use its best efforts 14 to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material; (c) inform the person or 15 persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order; 16 and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and 17 Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 18 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE 19 PROTECTED MATERIAL 20 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain 21 inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, 22 the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil 23 Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever 24 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 25 without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and 26 (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a 27 communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work 28 product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the Stipulated Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 10 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 Protective Order submitted to the Court. 2 12. MISCELLANEOUS 3 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 4 person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 5 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 6 Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to 7 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this 8 Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any 9 ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Stipulated 10 Protective Order. 11 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 12 Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material 13 may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 14 specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material 15 under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information 16 in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 17 13. FINAL DISPOSITION 18 After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60 19 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return 20 all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in 21 this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, 22 summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected 23 Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving 24 Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same 25 person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies 26 (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or 27 destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, 28 abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 11 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to 2 retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing 3 transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert 4 reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such 5 materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or 6 constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in 7 Section 4 (DURATION). 8 /// 9 /// 10 / / / 11 / / / 12 / / / 13 / / / 14 / / / 15 / / / 16 / / / 17 / / / 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 12 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 14. Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate 2 measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary 3 sanctions. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 5 6 Dated: November 28, 2018 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP 7 8 By: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: November 28, 2018 /s/ Kevin M. Brown SANDRA L. McDONOUGH CORRIE J. KLEKOWSKI KEVIN M. BROWN Attorneys for Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, AURORA WOLFGANG, TERRI J. NELSON, MARIA ANTONIETA GALLEGOS-RUIZ, ARTURO FERNANDEZ-GIBERT, ERI YASUHARA, RISA DICKSON, and ANDREW BODMAN LAW OFFICES OF JUAN HONG, ALC 18 By: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 /s/ Juan Hong JUAN HONG Attorney for Plaintiff MYUNG CHOI FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 3, 2018 _______________________________ HON. SHASHI H. KEWALRAMANI United States Magistrate Judge 28 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 13 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION EXHIBIT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of __________________________________________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on [date] in the case of Choi v. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et al., 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (DTBx). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of _______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. Date: ______________________________________ City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ Printed name: _______________________________ Signature: __________________________________ 28 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 14 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 2 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 5-4.3.4(a) of the Local Rules, I hereby certify that the 3 content is acceptable to Juan Hong, counsel for Plaintiff, and that I obtained 4 authorization from him to affix his electronic signature to this document. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: November 28, 2018 By: /s/ Kevin M. Brown SANDRA L. McDONOUGH KEVIN M. BROWN Attorneys for Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, AURORA WOLFGANG, TERRI J. NELSON, MARIA ANTONIETA GALLEGOS-RUIZ, ARTURO FERNANDEZ-GIBERT, ERI YASUHARA, RISA DICKSON, and ANDREW BODMAN 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP Case No. 5:14 CV 01707 VAP (SHKx) 15 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?