Cecil Shaw v. Palomar Investments et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION 24 ; ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendant Palomar Investments, a General Partnership, the parties who have appeared in this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. (ad)

,-

¡/ \

(-)
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
2 332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112
3 Telephnne [phone]

Faèsimile (40ID 298-6046
4 Email: tanya~moorelawfirm.com
5 Attorneys for

Cecil Shaw

Plaintiff

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CECIL SHAW,
No. 5:14-cv-01724-VAP-SP
12
13

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF ACTION

vs.

14

PALOMAR INVESTMENTS, a
15 General Partnership, et aI.,
16

Defendants.
17
18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26

27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Page i

,

IT is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and
2 Defendant Palomar Investments, a General Partnership, the parties who have
3 appeared in this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to
4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41

(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is

5 hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
6
7 Date: December 2, 2014

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

8

9
10
11

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw

12
13

JAMPOL ZIMET LLP

14
15

16

17

/s/ Steven J. Markowitz
Steven J. Markowitz
Attorneys for Defendant
Palomar Investments

18
19

20
IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

DATED:~

23

'vi fA PL

21

24

UNIT D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25

26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Page

2