Yolanda P. Bernardo v. The Bank Of New York Mellon, As Trustee For CIT Mortgage Loan Trust 07-00001 et al

Filing 16

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Defendants are dismissed from the action with prejudice; 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff; 3. Plaintiff shall take nothing as against Defendants; 4. Defendants may recover their costs. IT IS SO ORDERED.Related to: MOTION to Dismiss Case 5 ; Order, 14 . (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YOLANDA P. BERNARDO, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AS TRUSTEE FOR CIT MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-1; CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; SUMMIT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC; VERICREST FINANCIAL, INC.; WILMINGTON FINANCE, INC. and DOES 1-50, Inclusive, 20 Case No. 5:14-CV-01755-ODW-DTBx JUDGMENT Courtroom: Judge: 11 Hon. Otis D.Wright, II. Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL123716385.1 JUDGMENT 1 Following this Court’s October 6, 2013 Order granting Defendants 2 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AS TRUSTEE FOR CIT MORTGAGE 3 LOAN TRUST 2007-1, CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. f/k/a VERICREST 4 FINANCIAL, INC. (erroneously sued separately as “CALIBER HOME LOANS, 5 INC.” and “VERICREST FINANCIAL, INC.”), MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 6 REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., and SUMMIT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 7 LLC’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiff 8 YOLANDA P. BERNARDO (“Plaintiff”), the Court hereby enters judgment as 9 follows: 10 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 11 1. Defendants are dismissed from the action with prejudice 12 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff 13 3. Plaintiff shall take nothing as against Defendants 14 4. Defendants may recover their costs 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: October 8, 2014 By: ____________________________ United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL123716385.1 -2- JUDGMENT 1 2 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Los Angeles County, 3 California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled 4 action. My business address is 1888 Century Park E., Suite 1700, Los Angeles, 5 California 90067-1721. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for 6 collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States 7 Postal Service. On October 8, 2014, I placed with this firm at the above address for 8 deposit with the United States Postal Service a true and correct copy of the within 9 document(s): 10 11 12 13 14 JUDGMENT in a sealed envelope, postage fully paid, addressed as follows: Ms. Yolanda P. Bernardo 41376 Patri Circle Murrieta, CA 92562 15 16 17 Plaintiff In Pro Per Following ordinary business practices, the envelope was sealed and placed 18 for collection and mailing on this date, and would, in the ordinary course of 19 business, be deposited with the United States Postal Service on this date. 20 21 22 I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on October 8, 2014, at Los Angeles, California. 23 24 Carolyn A. Sanford 25 26 27 28 LEGAL123716385.1 -3- JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?