Yolanda P. Bernardo v. The Bank Of New York Mellon, As Trustee For CIT Mortgage Loan Trust 07-00001 et al
Filing
16
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Defendants are dismissed from the action with prejudice; 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff; 3. Plaintiff shall take nothing as against Defendants; 4. Defendants may recover their costs. IT IS SO ORDERED.Related to: MOTION to Dismiss Case 5 ; Order, 14 . (lom)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YOLANDA P. BERNARDO,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON AS TRUSTEE FOR CIT
MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-1;
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.;
SUMMIT MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, LLC; VERICREST
FINANCIAL, INC.; WILMINGTON
FINANCE, INC. and DOES 1-50,
Inclusive,
20
Case No. 5:14-CV-01755-ODW-DTBx
JUDGMENT
Courtroom:
Judge:
11
Hon. Otis D.Wright, II.
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL123716385.1
JUDGMENT
1
Following this Court’s October 6, 2013 Order granting Defendants
2
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AS TRUSTEE FOR CIT MORTGAGE
3
LOAN TRUST 2007-1, CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. f/k/a VERICREST
4
FINANCIAL, INC. (erroneously sued separately as “CALIBER HOME LOANS,
5
INC.” and “VERICREST FINANCIAL, INC.”), MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
6
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., and SUMMIT MANAGEMENT COMPANY,
7
LLC’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiff
8
YOLANDA P. BERNARDO (“Plaintiff”), the Court hereby enters judgment as
9
follows:
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
11
1.
Defendants are dismissed from the action with prejudice
12
2.
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff
13
3.
Plaintiff shall take nothing as against Defendants
14
4.
Defendants may recover their costs
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated: October 8, 2014
By: ____________________________
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL123716385.1
-2-
JUDGMENT
1
2
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Los Angeles County,
3
California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled
4
action. My business address is 1888 Century Park E., Suite 1700, Los Angeles,
5
California 90067-1721. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for
6
collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States
7
Postal Service. On October 8, 2014, I placed with this firm at the above address for
8
deposit with the United States Postal Service a true and correct copy of the within
9
document(s):
10
11
12
13
14
JUDGMENT
in a sealed envelope, postage fully paid, addressed as follows:
Ms. Yolanda P. Bernardo
41376 Patri Circle
Murrieta, CA 92562
15
16
17
Plaintiff In Pro Per
Following ordinary business practices, the envelope was sealed and placed
18
for collection and mailing on this date, and would, in the ordinary course of
19
business, be deposited with the United States Postal Service on this date.
20
21
22
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court
at whose direction the service was made.
Executed on October 8, 2014, at Los Angeles, California.
23
24
Carolyn A. Sanford
25
26
27
28
LEGAL123716385.1
-3-
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?