Estate of Betty Goldberg, Deceased et al v. Goss-Jewett Company, Inc. et al

Filing 439

JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Estate of Betty Goldberg, Deceased, and Estate of Al Goldberg, Deceased (Plaintiffs) take nothing, and that Plaintiffs' claims against all Defend ants and Intervenors be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and that judgment is entered against Plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the Court's June 23, 2016 Order Dismissing Remainder of Case, all counterclaims, cross claims, and third party claims are dismissed without prejudice. (bp)

1
2
3

JS-6

4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

ESTATE OF BETTY GOLDBERG,
DECEASED and ESTATE OF AL
GOLDBERG, DECEASED, by and
through their successor in interest Daniel
Rubin,

14
15
16
17
18

Case No.: 5:14-cv-01872-DSF (AFMx)

JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,
v.
GOSS-JEWETT COMPANY, INC,
et al.,
Defendants.

19
20

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS
AND THIRD-PARTY ACTIONS.

21
22

On June 3, 2016, this Court issued an Order Granting Motion for Summary

23

Judgment (Dkt. No. 265) filed by Intervenors Vigilant Insurance Company; The

24

Standard Fire Insurance Company; Great American Insurance Company of New

25

York, F/K/A American National Fire Insurance Company; Century Indemnity

26

Company, as Successor to CCI Insurance Company, as Successor to Insurance

27

Company of North America; and Defendants the Estate of Benjamin F. Fohrman,

28

Deceased, and the Estate of Robert Schack, Deceased. Based on the grounds
1
JUDGMENT

1

indicated in the June 3 Order; the December 16, 2014, Order Granting in Part and

2

Denying in Part Motions to Dismiss; and the June 23, 2016 Order Dismissing

3

Remainder of Case,

4

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants

5

Estate of Betty Goldberg, Deceased, and Estate of Al Goldberg, Deceased

6

(Plaintiffs) take nothing, and that Plaintiffs’ claims against all Defendants and

7

Intervenors be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and that judgment is entered

8

against Plaintiffs.

9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the Court’s June 23, 2016 Order

10

Dismissing Remainder of Case, all counterclaims, cross claims, and third party

11

claims are dismissed without prejudice.

12
13
14
15

DATED: August 9, 2016
________________________________________
Hon. Dale S. Fischer
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JUDGMENT