Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. d/b/a Office Star et al v. Herman Miller, Inc.

Filing 394

MINUTES OF PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OFLAW ON THE BASIS OF NO. 1 INVALIDITY OF ASSERTED EAMESTRADE DRESSES 374 ; PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE BASIS OF NO. 2 INFRINGEMENT, DIL UTION AND WILLFULNESS 375 ; PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE BASIS OF NO. 3 DAMAGES 376 ; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO THE EAMES TRADE DRESS 379 ; and DEFENDANT' S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE BASIS OF TRADE DRESS VALIDITY, AND A NEW TRIAL ONINFRINGEMENT 380 held before Judge John A. Kronstadt: The motion hearing is held. Counsel address the issues raised by the Court with respect to Pla intiff's Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law (the "Plaintiff's Motions"), and Defendant's Motion for Permanent Injunction and Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (the "Defendant's Motions"). Counsel address the Court. The Court takes Plaintiff's Motions and Defendant's Motions UNDER SUBMISSION and will issue a written ruling. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (pso)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. ED CV14-01926 JAK (SPx) Title Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. d/b/a Office Star, et al. v. Herman Miller, Inc. Present: The Honorable Date May 1, 2017 JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Andrea Keifer Alex Joko Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: David A. Dillard Sami I. Schilly Jean-Paul Ciardullo Proceedings: PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE BASIS OF NO. 1 INVALIDITY OF ASSERTED EAMES TRADE DRESSES (Dkt. 374) PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE BASIS OF NO. 2 INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION AND WILLFULNESS (Dkt. 375) PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE BASIS OF NO. 3 DAMAGES (Dkt. 376) DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO THE EAMES TRADE DRESS (Dkt. 379) DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE BASIS OF TRADE DRESS VALIDITY, AND A NEW TRIAL ON INFRINGEMENT (Dkt. 380) The motion hearing is held. Counsel address the issues raised by the Court with respect to Plaintiff’s Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law (the “Plaintiff’s Motions”), and Defendant’s Motion for Permanent Injunction and Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (the “Defendant’s Motions”). Counsel address the Court. The Court takes Plaintiff’ Motions and Defendant’s Motions UNDER SUBMISSION and will issue a written ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Initials of Preparer : 45 ak Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?