Troy Ament v. City of Montclair

Filing 31

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CITY OF MONTCLAIR AND AGAINST TROY AMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment be granted in favor of Defendant CITY OF MONTCLAIR and against Plaintiff TROY AMENT in the above-captioned action. The case is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

JS-6
1

FILED

2

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

3

10/29/2015

4
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

cw
BY: ___________________ DEPUTY

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 TROY AMENT,
12
13

CASE NO.: ED CV 14-02005-AB (JEMx)
Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CITY OF
MONTCLAIR AND AGAINST TROY
AMENT

14 vs.
15

CITY OF MONTCLAIR, and DOES 1
16 through 10, inclusive,
17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CITY OF MONTCLAIR AND AGAINST TROY AMENT

1

Defendant CITY OF MONTCLAIR’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”)

2 was called for hearing on October 19, 2015 in Courtroom 4 of the above-entitled Court,
3 the Honorable Andre Birotté Jr. presiding. Dkt. No. 27. After the hearing, the Court
4 issued an Order granting the CITY OF MONTCLAIR’s Motion. Dkt. No. 28.
5

For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order granting the Motion (Dkt. No. 28), IT

6 IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment be granted in favor of Defendant CITY OF
7 MONTCLAIR and against Plaintiff TROY AMENT in the above-captioned action. The
8 case is dismissed with prejudice.
9
10 DATED: October 29, 2015
11
12

_____________________________________
HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CITY OF MONTCLAIR AND AGAINST TROY AMENT