Robert Sherfey v. Lowe's HIW, Inc. et al
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF ROBERT SHERFEYS MOTION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT by Judge Manuel L. Real: 15 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Sherfeys Motion to Remand Action to State Court is DENIED. (Dkt. No. 15.) (pj)
1
2
3
NO JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
ROBERT SHERFEY, an individual,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
v.
LOWE’S HIW, INC. a Corporation;
DAVE JENKINS, Individual; DOES 1-10,
business entit(ies), forms unknown;
DOES 11-20, individual(s); and Does 21-30,
inclusive
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-2006-R
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF ROBERT
SHERFEY’S MOTION TO REMAND
ACTION TO STATE COURT
Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Sherfey’s Motion to Remand Action to State Court.
23
Finding the matter suitable for decision on the papers, the Court took it under submission on
24
November 24, 2014.
25
Generally, the presence of a non-diverse party automatically destroys subject-matter
26
jurisdiction. Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections v. Schacht, 524 U.S. 381, 389 (1998). However, if
27
the plaintiff fails to state a cause of action against a resident defendant, and the failure is obvious
28
according to the settled rules of the state, the joinder of the resident defendant is fraudulent and
1
should be disregarded for purposes of subject-matter jurisdiction. McCabe v. General Foods
2
Corp., 811 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1987).
3
Here, the claims against the non-diverse defendant, Dave Jenkins, have been dismissed
4
with prejudice. Accordingly, Plaintiff has obviously failed to state a claim against Defendant
5
Jenkins according to the settled rules of California, and the citizenship of Defendant Jenkins is
6
disregarded. Because the remaining parties are diverse, the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction
7
over the present case.
8
9
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Sherfey’s Motion to Remand Action to State
Court is DENIED. (Dkt. No. 15.)
Dated: December 4, 2014.
11
12
13
14
___________________________________
MANUEL L. REAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?