Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. et al

Filing 28

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Stipulation for Protective Order 27 The parties are advised the Court declines to issue the proposed protective order to which they have stipulated (See Order) The parties are further directed to the Courts sample stipulated protective order located on the Courts website for a sample of the format of an approved stipulated protective order. (dts)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 14-02094-VAP (KKx)

Date: July 17, 2015

Title: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.,
et al.
DOCKET ENTRY
PRESENT:

HON. KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D. Taylor
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:

None present

n/a
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

The parties’ proposed Stipulation and Protective Order has been referred by the
District Judge to the Magistrate Judge for consideration. The parties are advised the
Court declines to issue the proposed protective order to which they have stipulated
for the following reason:
1.

Proposed ¶ 6.3 remains deficient for the reasons set forth in this
Court’s June 9, 2015 Order. The proposed paragraph needs to be
revised to make clear that any motion challenging a designation of
material as Confidential or requesting a modification of the
Protective Order will need to be made in strict compliance with
Local Rules 37-1 and 37-2 (including the Joint Stipulation
requirement).

The parties are further directed to the Court’s sample stipulated protective
order located on the Court’s website for a sample of the format of an approved
stipulated protective order.

MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN

Initials of Deputy Clerk DT