Ismet Okyay Camlibel v. Cathy Lee Pattiz

Filing 11

IN CHAMBERS ORDER DISMISSING Case WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. On November 10, 2014, this Court dismissed without prejudice Plaintiffs claim for lack of jurisdiction. (Dkt. 6 ) Because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, on January 13, 2015, the Court acted on its own motion and ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Dkt. 9 ) On January 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed a response to the Courts order. (Dkt. 10 ) Th e Court considered Plaintiffs response and finds that Plaintiff fails to show why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. For the foregoing reasons, the Court acting on its own motion DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs claim. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kss)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

5:14-cv-2231-SVW (DTBx)

Title

Ismet Okyay Camlibel v. Cathy Lee Pattiz

Present: The
Honorable

Date

February 17, 2015

STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Paul M. Cruz

N/A

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A

N/A

Proceedings:

IN CHAMBERS ORDER DISMISSING Case WITH PREJUDICE

On November 10, 2014, this Court dismissed without prejudice Plaintiff’s claim for lack of
jurisdiction. (Dkt. 6.) Because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, on January 13, 2015, the
Court acted on its own motion and ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed
for lack of prosecution. (Dkt. 9.) On January 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed a response to the Court’s order.
(Dkt. 10.)
The Court considered Plaintiff’s response and finds that Plaintiff fails to show why the case
should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. For the foregoing reasons, the Court acting on its own
motion DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s claim.

:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PMC
Page 1 of 1