Lamya Brewster v. City of Los Angeles, et al
Filing
157
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order to Show Cause Why Motion Should Not Be Denied as Untimely. Accordingly, Archers Vineland Service, Inc. is hereby ordered to show cause, on or before July 22, 2019 (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
ED 14-2257-JGB (SPx)
Title
Lamya Brewster, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
Present: The Honorable
Date
July 16, 2019
Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge
Kimberly Carter
None
None
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
Attorneys Present for Defendant:
None Present
None Present
Proceedings:
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Motion Should Not Be Denied
as Untimely
On July 8, 2019, non-party Archer’s Vineland Service, Inc. filed a motion for a
protective order quashing or, in the alternative, limiting plaintiffs’ deposition subpoena,
and for monetary sanctions against plaintiffs and their counsel, and noticed it for hearing
on August 20, 2019. The motion was accompanied by a joint stipulation as required by
Local Rule 37-2.
The current discovery cutoff date is July 29, 2019. Under the October 23, 2017
Civil Trial Scheduling Order, the discovery cutoff is the last date to complete all
discovery, including expert testimony, and is also the last day for hearing any discovery
motions. Since the instant motion is set for hearing after the discovery cutoff date, it is
untimely.
Accordingly, Archer’s Vineland Service, Inc. is hereby ordered to show cause, on
or before July 22, 2019, why the motion for a protective order should not be denied as
untimely. If defendant withdraws the motion on or before July 22, 2019, the order to
show cause will be discharged.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?