Richard Sinohui v. CEC Entertainment, Inc.

Filing 31

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Stipulation for Protective Order 30 (See Order for details) (dts)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 GARY M. MCLAUGHLIN (SBN 217832) CHRISTOPHER K. PETERSEN (SBN 260631) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3010 Phone: (310)-229-1000 Attorneys for Defendant, CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 James M. Trush, Esq. (SBN 140088) TRUSH LAW OFFICE, APC. 695 Town Center Drive, Suite 700 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7187 Tel.: (714) 384-6390 Todd H. Harrison, Esq. (SBN 230542) Brennan S. Kahn, Esq. (SBN 259548) PERONA, LANGER, BECK, SERBIN, MENDOZA & HARRISON, APC. 300 East San Antonio Drive Long Beach, California 90807 Phone: (562) 426-6155; Fax: (562) 490-9823 Attorneys for Plaintiff, RICHARD SINOHUI 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION 18 19 RICHARD SINOHUI, on behalf of Case No. 5:14-cv-02516-JLS (KKx) himself and all others similarly situated, 20 [Assigned to Hon. Josephine L. Stanton] Plaintiffs, 21 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS vs. 22 23 24 25 CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Kansas corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive. Defendant. Action Filed: October 10, 2014 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS 1 In this lawsuit, Plaintiff, Richard Sinohui (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of himself 2 and other current and former employees and the general public, seek damages and 3 other relief against Defendant, CEC Entertainment, Inc. (“Defendant”), for alleged 4 violations of the California Labor Code and other unlawful business practices 5 alleged in his complaint. During discovery, Plaintiff requested that Defendant 6 identify all putative class members during the relevant time period. Defendant 7 objected to providing this information based on the privacy protections of Article I, 8 Section I of the California Constitution, among other reasons. The parties met and 9 conferred about the information sought and agreed to a method balancing the 10 Plaintiff’s need for the information and the privacy rights of the Defendant and 11 third parties concerned. 12 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, 13 by and through his counsel of record, James M. Trush of the Trush Law Office, 14 APC. and Todd H. Harrison of Perona, Langer, Beck, Serbin, Mendoza & 15 Harrison, APC., and Defendant, by and through its counsel of record, Gary M. 16 McLaughlin of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP., as follows: 17 1. Kurtzman Carson Consultants (“KCC” or ‘the Administrator”), a third 18 party administrator shall mail the letter attached as Exhibit “A” to all of 19 Defendant’s current and former employees who may be members of the putative 20 classes alleged in the complaint. Defendant will provide to the Administrator the 21 names, last known addresses and last known telephone numbers (to the extent 22 available) within ten (10) calendar days after written notice of the order on this 23 stipulation; 24 2. If an individual identified above does not want his/her address or 25 telephone number to be provided to the Plaintiffs, he/she may sign and return the 26 postage-prepaid postcard attached as Exhibit “B”; 27 /// 28 2 STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS 1 3. Thirty (30) days after mailing Exhibit “A,” the Administrator shall 2 provide Plaintiff with the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all current 3 and former employees who may be a member of the classes alleged in the 4 complaint and who did not sign and return the postcard attached as Exhibit “B”. 5 The Administrator shall provide Defendant with a list of those class members who 6 did sign and return the postcard; 7 4. Plaintiff’s representatives may contact the individuals to discover 8 whether they have knowledge of the alleged Labor Code violations and alleged 9 unfair business practices; 10 5. Plaintiff shall keep the names and contact information of putative 11 class members and any information discovered by this process confidential, and 12 shall use such information only for purposes of investigating, prosecuting and/or 13 settlement of this litigation only, such information to be treated as Confidential 14 information under the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order; and 15 16 6. The parties agree that this procedure is consistent with Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. Sup. Ct. (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 554. 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 1 19 20 Dated: June 16, 2015 21 22 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLP GARY M. MCLAUGHLIN By: 23 24 25 //s// Gary M. McLaughlin Attorneys for Defendant, CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 26 27 28 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2), the filing party has obtained the authorization and approval of all signatories listed to file this stipulation. 3 STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS 1 Dated: June 16, 2015 2 TRUSH LAW OFFICE, APC JAMES M. TRUSH 3 By: 4 //s// James M. Trush Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard Sinohui 5 6 7 8 Dated: June 16, 2015 9 PERONA LANGER BECK SERBIN MENDOZA, APC TODD H. HARRISON 10 By: 11 //s// Todd H. Harrison Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard Sinohui 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: July 15, 2015 By Hon. Kenly Kiya Kato United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?