Richard Sinohui v. CEC Entertainment, Inc.
Filing
31
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Stipulation for Protective Order 30 (See Order for details) (dts)
1
2
3
4
5
GARY M. MCLAUGHLIN (SBN 217832)
CHRISTOPHER K. PETERSEN (SBN 260631)
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3010
Phone:
(310)-229-1000
Attorneys for Defendant,
CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
James M. Trush, Esq. (SBN 140088)
TRUSH LAW OFFICE, APC.
695 Town Center Drive, Suite 700
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7187
Tel.: (714) 384-6390
Todd H. Harrison, Esq. (SBN 230542)
Brennan S. Kahn, Esq. (SBN 259548)
PERONA, LANGER, BECK, SERBIN,
MENDOZA & HARRISON, APC.
300 East San Antonio Drive
Long Beach, California 90807
Phone: (562) 426-6155; Fax: (562) 490-9823
Attorneys for Plaintiff, RICHARD SINOHUI
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
17
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION
18
19
RICHARD SINOHUI, on behalf of
Case No. 5:14-cv-02516-JLS (KKx)
himself and all others similarly situated,
20
[Assigned to Hon. Josephine L. Stanton]
Plaintiffs,
21
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE
DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF
CLASS MEMBERS
vs.
22
23
24
25
CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a
Kansas corporation; and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive.
Defendant.
Action Filed:
October 10, 2014
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS
1
In this lawsuit, Plaintiff, Richard Sinohui (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of himself
2
and other current and former employees and the general public, seek damages and
3
other relief against Defendant, CEC Entertainment, Inc. (“Defendant”), for alleged
4
violations of the California Labor Code and other unlawful business practices
5
alleged in his complaint. During discovery, Plaintiff requested that Defendant
6
identify all putative class members during the relevant time period. Defendant
7
objected to providing this information based on the privacy protections of Article I,
8
Section I of the California Constitution, among other reasons. The parties met and
9
conferred about the information sought and agreed to a method balancing the
10
Plaintiff’s need for the information and the privacy rights of the Defendant and
11
third parties concerned.
12
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff,
13
by and through his counsel of record, James M. Trush of the Trush Law Office,
14
APC. and Todd H. Harrison of Perona, Langer, Beck, Serbin, Mendoza &
15
Harrison, APC., and Defendant, by and through its counsel of record, Gary M.
16
McLaughlin of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP., as follows:
17
1.
Kurtzman Carson Consultants (“KCC” or ‘the Administrator”), a third
18
party administrator shall mail the letter attached as Exhibit “A” to all of
19
Defendant’s current and former employees who may be members of the putative
20
classes alleged in the complaint. Defendant will provide to the Administrator the
21
names, last known addresses and last known telephone numbers (to the extent
22
available) within ten (10) calendar days after written notice of the order on this
23
stipulation;
24
2.
If an individual identified above does not want his/her address or
25
telephone number to be provided to the Plaintiffs, he/she may sign and return the
26
postage-prepaid postcard attached as Exhibit “B”;
27
///
28
2
STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS
1
3.
Thirty (30) days after mailing Exhibit “A,” the Administrator shall
2
provide Plaintiff with the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all current
3
and former employees who may be a member of the classes alleged in the
4
complaint and who did not sign and return the postcard attached as Exhibit “B”.
5
The Administrator shall provide Defendant with a list of those class members who
6
did sign and return the postcard;
7
4.
Plaintiff’s representatives may contact the individuals to discover
8
whether they have knowledge of the alleged Labor Code violations and alleged
9
unfair business practices;
10
5.
Plaintiff shall keep the names and contact information of putative
11
class members and any information discovered by this process confidential, and
12
shall use such information only for purposes of investigating, prosecuting and/or
13
settlement of this litigation only, such information to be treated as Confidential
14
information under the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order; and
15
16
6.
The parties agree that this procedure is consistent with Belaire-West
Landscape, Inc. v. Sup. Ct. (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 554.
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 1
19
20
Dated: June 16, 2015
21
22
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER &
FELD, LLP
GARY M. MCLAUGHLIN
By:
23
24
25
//s//
Gary M. McLaughlin
Attorneys for Defendant,
CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
26
27
28
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2), the filing party has obtained the
authorization and approval of all signatories listed to file this stipulation.
3
STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS
1
Dated: June 16, 2015
2
TRUSH LAW OFFICE, APC
JAMES M. TRUSH
3
By:
4
//s//
James M. Trush
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Richard Sinohui
5
6
7
8
Dated: June 16, 2015
9
PERONA LANGER BECK SERBIN
MENDOZA, APC
TODD H. HARRISON
10
By:
11
//s//
Todd H. Harrison
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Richard Sinohui
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: July 15, 2015
By
Hon. Kenly Kiya Kato
United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY OF IDENTITIES OF CLASS MEMBERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?