Herbert Wolff v. State of California et al

Filing 16

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (See Order for complete details) (afe)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HERBERT WOLFF,
12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et. al.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. ED CV 15-00244-VBF (AS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

)
17
18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the
19

Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), all of the records herein, and the
20

Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.

The

21

Court has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report
22

and Recommendation

to

which

Objections

were

directed

(see

Docket

23

Entry

No.

13),

and

concurs

with

the

Magistrate

Judge’s

order

24

construing Plaintiff’s objections as a request for additional time to
25
26
27

file a First Amended Complaint (see Docket Entry No. 14). However,
even after being granted the requested extension of time to file a
First Amended Complaint curing the deficiencies of the Complaint,

28
1

1

Plaintiff has failed to file a First Amended Complaint.

2

concurs

3

Magistrate Judge.

with

and

accepts

the

findings

and

The Court

conclusions

of

the

4

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this

5
6

action with prejudice.

7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order

8
9
10

and

the

Judgment

herein

on

Plaintiff

at

his

current

address

record.

11
12

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

13
14

DATED: January 13, 2016

15
16
17
18

_______________________________
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

of