Timothy Keiper v. Kim Holland

Filing 24

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge David O. Carter: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by Petitioner. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing thePetition and entire action with prejudice. (lwag)

1
2
3
4

O

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

TIMOTHY KEIPER,

12

Petitioner,

13
14
15

vs.
KIM HOLLAND, WARDEN,

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. EDCV 15-00254-DOC (KES)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other

18 records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States
19 Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by
20 Petitioner. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the
21 Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and
22 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
1

1

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the

2 Petition and entire action with prejudice.
3
4 DATED: March 16, 2016
5
6

_______________________________
DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2