Calvin Edward Price v. Warden

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO KEEP COURT APPRISED OF ADDRESS by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner shall have until September 3, 2015 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address and for failure to prosecute. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (gr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.:
Title:

ED CV 15-0381 MWF (RAO)
Calvin Edward Price v. Warden

Present:

Date:

August 20, 2015

The Honorable ROZELLA A. OLIVER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Gay Roberson
Deputy Clerk

N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

N/A

N/A

Proceedings:

(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR
FAILURE TO KEEP COURT APPRISED OF ADDRESS

On March 16, 2015, the Court issued an Order Requiring Response to Petition. Dkt. No.
3. Paragraph 12 of that order requires Petitioner to “immediately notify the Court and counsel
for Respondent of any change of Petitioner’s address” and states that, “[i]f Petitioner fails to
keep the Court informed of where Petitioner may be contacted, this action will be subject to
dismissal for failure to prosecute. See also Local Rule 41-6.” Id. at ¶ 12.
Local Rule 41-6 states as follows:
A party proceeding pro se shall keep the Court and opposing parties apprised of such
party’s current address…. If mail directed by the Clerk to a pro se plaintiff’s address
of record is returned undelivered by the Postal Service, and if, within fifteen (15) days
of the service date, such plaintiff fails to notify, in writing, the Court and opposing
parties of said plaintiff’s current address, the Court may dismiss the action with or
without prejudice for want of prosecution.
On May 12, 2015, the Clerk delivered notice, by First Class U.S. Mail or by other means,
of the electronic filing of Document Number 8 to petitioner Calvin Edward Price (“Petitioner”)
at his address of record. Dkt. No. 8. On June 4, 2015, that notice was returned undelivered by
the Postal Service. Dkt. No. 9.
In light of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner shall have until September 3,
2015 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to keep the Court apprised
of his current address and for failure to prosecute.
:
gr
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (05/15)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1