Michael O DeVaughn v. John McDonell

Filing 98

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr for Motion for Leave to Amend 73 , Report and Recommendation (Issued), 95 . The Court concludes that nothing in the Objection affects or alters the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report and accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. (ec)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL O. DEVAUGHN,

12
13
14
15

Petitioner
v.
JOHN MCDONELL,
Respondent.

Case No. EDCV 15-577-TJH (GJS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

16
17
18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Petitioner’s motion for

19

leave to amend [Dkt. 73-74, the “Motion”] and the parties’ related briefing and

20

lodgments [Dkt. 76-77, 82], the operative habeas petition in this case [Dkt. 1,

21

“Petition”], the pleadings and other documents filed in this action, the Report and

22

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 95, “Report”], and

23

Petitioner’s Objection to the Report [Dkt. 97]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

24

and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those

25

portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

26
27

The Court concludes that nothing in the Objection affects or alters the

28

analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report and accepts the findings and

1

recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the

2

Motion is DENIED.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

DATED: November 6, 2017

__________________________________
TERRY J. HATTER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2