Oscar Urbano v. SMG Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 199

JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The jury trial scheduled to begin on June 13, 2017 is taken off-calendar. 2. All claims by Plaintiffs against Defendant SMG are hereby dismissed. 3. This document shall constitute a judgment for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

OSCAR URBANO, an individual,
MICHAEL RANGEL, an individual,
and DEMETHA STROMAN, an
individual, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17

vs.
SMG HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware
corporation; SMG, a business entity,
form unknown; and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive,

Case No. EDCV 15-0603-AG (MRWx)
[Assigned to Honorable Andrew J.
Guilford, Courtroom 10D; Magistrate
Judge Michael R. Wilner]
JUDGMENT
Complaint Filed: January 27, 2015
Date of Removal: March 27, 2015

18
19

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Case No. EDCV 15-0603-AG (MRWx)

1

Defendant SMG (“SMG”) offered to allow entry of judgment pursuant to

2

Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to each of Plaintiffs Oscar Urbano

3

(“Plaintiff Urbano”) and Demetha Stroman (“Plaintiff Stroman”) (collectively,

4

“Plaintiffs”) as follows: judgment in favor of Plaintiff Urbano against Defendant

5

SMG in the sum of $20,016.26 and judgment in favor of Plaintiff Stroman against

6

Defendant SMG in the sum of $25,011.50. For each respective plaintiff, the sum

7

offered includes all alleged damages, unpaid wages, premium payments, penalties,

8

unreimbursed expenses, interest, costs, and attorney fees otherwise recoverable in

9

this action. Plaintiffs each accepted his or her respective offer of judgment.

10
11
12
13

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS
FOLLOWS:
1.

The jury trial scheduled to begin on June 13, 2017 is taken off-

calendar.

14

2.

All claims by Plaintiffs against Defendant SMG are hereby dismissed.

15

3.

This document shall constitute a judgment for purposes of Federal

16

Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

17
18
19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 13, 2017
Dated: _____________________

_________________________________
HON. ANDREW J. GUILFORD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Case No. EDCV 15-0603-AG (MRWx)