E. W. v. City of Blythe et al
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Stipulation 48 is GRANTED. The action is dismissed with prejudice. The U.S. District Court will maintain jurisdiction. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
E.W, by and through her guardian ad
litem, SHAWNKIA WADE,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF BLYTHE, SCOTT ADAMS, )
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 15-cv-00970 CAS (SPx)
[Assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder,
Courtroom 8D]
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Complaint Filed: 11/18/2015
Trial Date:
05/16/17
21
22
The Court has reviewed and considered the stipulation by and between the
23
parties, through their respective counsel, Christie Bodnar Swiss and Vanessa A.
24
Evangelista , counsel for Defendant City of Blythe; Jerry L. Steering, counsel for
25
Plaintiff E.W., by and through her guardian ad litem, Shawnkia Wade; and Kevin M.
26
Osterberg, counsel for Defendant Scott Adams, that the action be dismissed as to all
27
defendants with prejudice. The U.S. District Court will maintain jurisdiction.
28
///
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
1
The Court makes the following orders:
2
The Stipulation is granted. The action is dismissed with prejudice. The U.S.
3
4
District Court will maintain jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
DATED: September 25, 2017
_
U.S. District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?