E. W. v. City of Blythe et al

Filing 49

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Stipulation 48 is GRANTED. The action is dismissed with prejudice. The U.S. District Court will maintain jurisdiction. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 E.W, by and through her guardian ad litem, SHAWNKIA WADE, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF BLYTHE, SCOTT ADAMS, ) and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 15-cv-00970 CAS (SPx) [Assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder, Courtroom 8D] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL Complaint Filed: 11/18/2015 Trial Date: 05/16/17 21 22 The Court has reviewed and considered the stipulation by and between the 23 parties, through their respective counsel, Christie Bodnar Swiss and Vanessa A. 24 Evangelista , counsel for Defendant City of Blythe; Jerry L. Steering, counsel for 25 Plaintiff E.W., by and through her guardian ad litem, Shawnkia Wade; and Kevin M. 26 Osterberg, counsel for Defendant Scott Adams, that the action be dismissed as to all 27 defendants with prejudice. The U.S. District Court will maintain jurisdiction. 28 /// 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 1 The Court makes the following orders: 2 The Stipulation is granted. The action is dismissed with prejudice. The U.S. 3 4 District Court will maintain jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: September 25, 2017 _ U.S. District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?