Siobhan Sansone v. City of San Bernardino et al
Filing
33
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge S. James Otero. Before the Court is a Notice of Settlement and Joint Stipulation. The partieshave reached settlement on all issues raised in this matter. The parties havefully performed thei r obligations under their settlement agreement. Havingread and considered the parties stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, it is ordered as follows: This case is dismissed with prejudicepursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)
JS-6
November 29, 2016
VC
P
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SIOBHAN SANSONE,
)
Case No.: 5:15-cv-01009 SJO
)
(JEM)
Plaintiff,
)
)
ORDER RE:
v.
)
DISMISSAL OF
)
DEFENDANTS WITH
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO and )
PREJUDICE
SAN BERNARDINO POLICE
)
DEPARTMENT,
)
)
Hon. S. James Otero
Defendants.
)
______________________________ )__________________
11
12
Before the Court is a Notice of Settlement and Joint Stipulation. The parties
13
have reached settlement on all issues raised in this matter. The parties have
14
fully performed their obligations under their settlement agreement. Having
15
read and considered the parties stipulation, and good cause appearing
16
therefore, it is ordered as follows: This case is dismissed with prejudice
17
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.
20
21
Dated: November 29, 2016
_________________________
22
S. James Otero
23
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?