Siobhan Sansone v. City of San Bernardino et al

Filing 33

ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge S. James Otero. Before the Court is a Notice of Settlement and Joint Stipulation. The partieshave reached settlement on all issues raised in this matter. The parties havefully performed thei r obligations under their settlement agreement. Havingread and considered the parties stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, it is ordered as follows: This case is dismissed with prejudicepursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)

Download PDF
JS-6 November 29, 2016 VC P 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SIOBHAN SANSONE, ) Case No.: 5:15-cv-01009 SJO ) (JEM) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER RE: v. ) DISMISSAL OF ) DEFENDANTS WITH CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO and ) PREJUDICE SAN BERNARDINO POLICE ) DEPARTMENT, ) ) Hon. S. James Otero Defendants. ) ______________________________ )__________________ 11 12 Before the Court is a Notice of Settlement and Joint Stipulation. The parties 13 have reached settlement on all issues raised in this matter. The parties have 14 fully performed their obligations under their settlement agreement. Having 15 read and considered the parties stipulation, and good cause appearing 16 therefore, it is ordered as follows: This case is dismissed with prejudice 17 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. 20 21 Dated: November 29, 2016 _________________________ 22 S. James Otero 23 United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?