Keivon Young v. County of San Bernardino et al

Filing 54

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym RE STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS [NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT IN 13, 22](SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)

Download PDF
1 Eugene P. Ramirez (State Bar No. 134865) epr@manningllp.com 2 Angela Powell (State Bar No. 191876) amp@manningllp.com 3 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 4 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 5 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 6 Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF 7 SAN BERNARDINO; SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF; 8 DEPUTY NICOLAS NICK TOLLEFSON, aka NICHOLAS 9 TOLLEFSON; DETECTIVE JUSTIN MUSELLA 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 KEIVON YOUNG, an individual, Case No. 5:15-CV-01102-JGB-SP Plaintiff, The Hon. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Magistrate, Sheri Pym 14 15 v. 16 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a 17 public entity; SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF, a public entity; 18 DEPUTY NICOLAS NICK TOLLEFSON, AKA NICHOLAS 19 TOLLEFSON, an individual; DETECTIVE JUSTIN MUSELLA, an 20 individual; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive, 21 Defendant. 22 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS [NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT IN ¶¶ 13, 22] Complaint filed: 6-7-15 23 24 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION of the parties, and Good Cause 25 appearing therefore, and in furtherance of the interests of justice, the Court hereby 26 GRANTS the Protective Order stipulated to by the parties regarding Confidential 27 Documents. Accordingly, 28 1 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the production, disclosure, sharing, 2 publication, reviewing, copying, retention, and/or dissemination of any and all 3 Confidential Documents, as defined under the parties’ Stipulation for Entry of a 4 Protective Order re Confidential Documents (hereafter as “Stipulation”), shall be 5 prohibited except as specified under the terms and conditions of the parties’ 6 aforementioned Stipulation, including the following terms and provisions: 7 8 1. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT. The parties acknowledge that there are certain types of documents that are 9 conceivably discoverable in this action but whose discovery may be complicated or 10 prohibited by issues of confidentiality, intellectual property, work product 11 protections, or various privileges. For purposes of this Order, "Confidential 12 Materials" include, but are not limited to the following: 13 a. Any and all police reports, including but not limited to, incident and 14 supplemental reports; crime analysis reports; radio communications; 911 calls; 15 autopsy reports; 16 b. Any and all police personnel files, including but not limited to, Internal 17 Affairs ("IA") investigation file documents, and comparable official government 18 information; 19 c. Third party information in police reports, including but not limited to, 20 incident and supplemental reports; crime analysis reports; 21 d. Personal information, including medical and mental health information, 22 e. Criminal history information which is not a matter of public record; 23 f. Educational and professional information; 24 g. Tax and/or financial records; and comparable records that a party 25 typically treats as confidential in the normal course of business or affairs. 26 2. In light of the foregoing, the parties further acknowledge that, absent a 27 protective order to limit the use or publication of such documents, in order to preserve 28 the parties' respective interests, the parties might otherwise withhold certain 2 1 documents from production or disclosure, which can then result in costly discovery 2 disputes potentially requiring Court intervention. 3 3. Defendant, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ("County"), further 4 contends that: (1) absent a court order thereon, police personnel records – including 5 Internal Affairs investigation files and related complaints, statements, and records – 6 are deemed confidential and preserved from disclosure under California state law 7 (e.g., California Penal Code §§ 832.7 and 832.8; California Evidence Code §§ 1040, 8 1043, and 1045); and (2) police personnel records are also deemed confidential by 9 federal decisional law (e.g., Sanchez v. Santa Ana Police Department (9th Cir. 1990) 10 936 F.2d 1027, 1033-1034). Plaintiffs do not necessarily agree with these contentions 11 as stated herein and plaintiff reserves all of plaintiffs’ rights under California and 12 federal law. 13 4. Therefore, in light of the foregoing, the parties agree that certain types 14 of confidential documents and/or information should be the subject of a protective 15 order. Accordingly, the parties, by and through their attorneys of record in this action, 16 hereby stipulate that good cause exists for a protective order in this matter regarding 17 confidential documents and/or information, and the parties respectfully request the 18 procedural protections listed herein below. 19 5. By agreeing to designate documents as "confidential " no party is 20 waiving its rights to assert and maintain objections and/or privileges, and by doing so 21 no party is admitting that such materials are subject to discovery or will be produced 22 and/or that such documents are admissible. 23 6. The parties agree unprotected disclosure of such information may 24 potentially "poison the jury pool", "affect jury service"' and/or cause or contribute to 25 potentially adverse pre-trial publicity. Defendant County also raises personal safety 26 and privacy concerns if such information is made available to the public. Defendant's 27 concerns are exacerbated by the nation’s current social climate and the added 28 concerns officers face in light of the national protests against the police. Adverse 3 1 pretrial publicity can create prejudice in a community and make it impossible for the 2 accused to receive a fair trial. Making the above-listed information publicly available 3 before trial will taint the jury pool and prejudice Defendant's ability to receive a fair 4 trial and put on a defense in this case. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 5 information, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such 6 material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the 7 end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice and each party's ability to receive 8 a fair trial, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the 9 intent of the parties that such information will not be designated as confidential for 10 tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that there 11 is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. Therefore, a 12 protective order is necessary to prevent any party from disclosing the "confidential" 13 information to the traditional media, internet, or "social media" and to limit the 14 dissemination of the material to those with a true need to know. 15 16 STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. 7. Plaintiffs and Defendant have agreed that the above-listed documents 17 shall be designated confidential documents and/or writings because the Parties 18 believe, in good faith, that some or all of these documents and/or writings are 19 privileged, confidential, private and/or are of a sensitive nature. 20 8. The confidentiality of documentation being provided pursuant to this 21 Protective Order will be accomplished by affixing to such document or writing a 22 legend, such as "Confidential," "Confidential Documents," "Confidential Material 23 Subject to Protective Order" or words of similar effect. The documents and writings 24 so designated, and all information derived from those documents (collectively 25 referred as "Confidential Information"), shall be treated in accordance with the terms 26 of this stipulation/protective order. The "Confidential" mark or watermark shall not 27 obscure the writings on the document's legibility and shall not be repeated more than 28 once per page. 4 1 9. Confidential Information may be used by those receiving such 2 information only for the purpose of this above-captioned litigation. 3 10. Subject to the further conditions imposed by this stipulation/protective 4 order, Confidential Information may be disclosed only to the following people: 5 a. Counsel for the parties and to experts, investigators, paralegal 6 assistants, office clerks, secretaries and other such personnel working under their 7 supervision; 8 b. Such other parties as may be agreed by written stipulation among the 9 parties here, or by Court Order; 10 c. Court personnel; and 11 d. The parties themselves as necessary for the defense or prosecution of 12 this action. 13 11. Prior to the disclosure of any Confidential Information to any person 14 described in paragraphs a-d , with the exception of all Court Personnel and 15 employees of counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant, counsel for the party that has 16 received and seeks to use or disclose such Confidential Information shall first 17 provide any such person with a copy of this protective order, and shall cause him or 18 her to execute the following acknowledgment: 19 "I understand that I am being given access to Confidential Information 20 pursuant to the foregoing protective order. I have read the stipulation/protective 21 order and agree to be bound by its terms with respect to the handling, use and 22 disclosure of such Confidential Information. 23 Dated: ___________________/s/ ____________________________" \ 24 Once this is completed, counsel will serve a copy of the acknowledgment 25 upon counsel for all other parties. 26 12. In the event that a recipient party or counsel contends that any 27 Confidential Documents were already in the possession of that party, or that party's 28 counsel, prior to the date of this Stipulation and Protective Order, or prior to such 5 1 documents' production in this matter by the producing-disclosing party, the recipient 2 party or counsel shall have the burden of proving that any such documents were in 3 fact already in the possession of the recipient party or that party's counsel prior to 4 the date of this Stipulation and Protective Order, or prior to such documents' 5 production in this matter. 6 13. The parties will attempt to resolve any issue regarding such disputed 7 documents or records pursuant to Local Rule 37.1 before submitting any such 8 dispute-issue to the Court. 9 14. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and despite any dispute as to whether 10 any documents produced should be subject to the terms of the Stipulation and 11 Protective Order as a result of prior possession, the parties will continue to treat the 12 document(s) at issue as confidential and subject to this Stipulation and Protective 13 Order until the Court rules upon the dispute or until the parties reach agreement on 14 the issue, whichever comes first. 15 15. If, upon review of such a dispute, the Court determines that the disputed 16 Confidential Documents were already in the possession of the recipient party or 17 counsel prior to the date of this Stipulation and Protective Order, or prior to such 18 documents' production in this matter, those specific documents shall not be subject to 19 paragraph 20's provisions on destruction of copies, nor shall the recipient party or 20 counsel be prohibited from using those specific documents in other litigation: 21 otherwise, the remaining provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order shall 22 continue to apply to such documents as Confidential Documents hereunder. 23 16. The recipient parties to the above entitled action, and/or their counsel, 24 and/or their agents or the agents or employees of their counsel, shall secure and 25 maintain the confidentiality of any and all Confidential Documents in their 26 possession, and shall ensure that such Confidential Documents are used only for the 27 purposes set forth herein below, and for no other purpose, and subject to the terms 28 and provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order. 6 1 17. Nothing in this Stipulation and Protective Order shall be construed as a 2 waiver by any party of any right to object on any ground to the use in any proceeding, 3 or to the admission into evidence, of any Confidential Documents. Nothing in this 4 Stipulation and Protective Order shall be construed so as to prevent the admission of 5 Confidential Documents into evidence at the trial of this matter solely on the basis of 6 the documents' designation as Confidential Documents. 7 18. Nothing in this Stipulation and Protective Order shall be construed as a 8 waiver by any party of any right it would otherwise have to object to disclosing or 9 producing any information or documents on any ground not specifically addressed in 10 this Stipulation and Protective Order, including but not limited to objections pursuant 11 to the California Government Code, California Evidence Code, California Penal 12 Code, the Official Records Privilege, the federal Official Information Privilege, the 13 federal Executive Deliberative Process Privilege, the law enforcement-investigative 14 privilege, the attorney-client privilege, the physician-patient privilege, the therapist15 patient privilege, the attorney work product protection, the taxpayer privilege, or the 16 right to Privacy under the United States Constitution, the California Constitution or 17 any other applicable state or federal authority, or any other privilege against disclosure 18 or production available under any provision of federal or California law. Nothing in 19 this Stipulation and Protective Order shall be construed as requiring the production or 20 disclosure of documents or information that may be or have been designated as 21 Confidential Documents. 22 19. This Stipulation and Protective Order shall not be construed as a 23 stipulation by any party that any privilege asserted by any party regarding 24 Confidential Documents, whether produced or disclosed or not, is applicable or valid 25 as to such documents; however, all parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, 26 agree to abide by the terms of this Stipulation and Protective Order and to maintain 27 such documents' confidentiality pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation and 28 Protective Order. 7 1 20. Upon the final termination of this litigation, including any appeal 2 pertaining thereto, all materials that were designated as confidential, as well as any 3 other Court Ordered Documents provided pursuant to this Protective Order and all 4 copies thereof, shall be destroyed and such destruction shall be confirmed by letter to 5 the office of counsel of the party to whom the materials pertain. 6 21. If any party who receives Confidential Information receives a subpoena 7 or other request seeking Confidential Information, he, she or it shall immediately give 8 written notice to counsel for the party to whom the request pertains, identifying the 9 Confidential Information sought and the time in which production or other disclosure 10 is required, and the affected party shall, per their discretion, object to the request or 11 subpoena on the grounds of this stipulation/protective order, OR other grounds and/or 12 obtain an order barring production or other disclosure, or to otherwise respond to the 13 subpoena or other request for production or disclosure of Confidential Material. No 14 party shall be obligated to seek an order barring production of Confidential 15 Information, which obligation shall be borne by the party to whom to the privileges 16 apply. The duty is to notify. However, in no event should production or disclosure be 17 made without written approval by the affected party's counsel unless required by 18 Court Order arising from a motion to compel production or disclosure of Confidential 19 Information. 20 22. Any pleadings, motions, briefs, declarations, stipulations, exhibits or 21 other written submissions to the Court in this litigation, except at trial, with which 22 Confidential Information is included shall be subject to a motion or application, at the 23 discretion of any desirous party, to request that the papers, or the confidential portion 24 thereof, be placed under seal by the Court, in accordance with Local Rule 79-5. 25 23. Counsel for the parties further agree that, during any portion of this 26 action, including the pre-trial (e.g. motions in limine) or trial of this action which 27 could entail the discussion or disclosure of Confidential Information, that any party 28 will have an opportunity to request that access to the courtroom be limited to parties, 8 1 their counsel and other designated representative, experts or consultants who agreed 2 to be bound by this stipulation/protective order, and court personnel. 3 24. Nothing here shall prejudice any party's rights to object to the 4 introduction of any Confidential Information into evidence, on grounds including but 5 not limited to relevance and privilege. 6 25. The fact that the parties have entered into this stipulation does not waive 7 any of parties' rights to challenge the designation of materials as confidential. 8 Nevertheless, the parties understand and acknowledge that non-public materials 9 contained within personal, financial and/or educational files and records are being 10 provided pursuant to this Protective Order and they are to remain protected by this 11 Order to the extent they were not publicly accessible originally. In the event there is 12 some "good faith" disagreement as to whether certain documents and/or information 13 provided by the parties that were labeled as "confidential" should be treated as 14 confidential, the parties agree to make informal attempts to resolve such issues. 15 However, to be clear, this stipulation and order in no way makes any originally 16 publicly accessible information confidential. 17 26. The Court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction over this matter to the 18 extent necessary to enforce the terms and /or address alleged breaches of this 19 protective order. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: January 22, 2016 23 ________________________________ SHERI PYM United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?