Keivon Young v. County of San Bernardino et al
Filing
54
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym RE STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS [NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT IN 13, 22](SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
1 Eugene P. Ramirez (State Bar No. 134865)
epr@manningllp.com
2 Angela Powell (State Bar No. 191876)
amp@manningllp.com
3 MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
4 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-3012
5 Telephone: (213) 624-6900
Facsimile: (213) 624-6999
6
Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF
7 SAN BERNARDINO; SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF;
8 DEPUTY NICOLAS NICK
TOLLEFSON, aka NICHOLAS
9 TOLLEFSON; DETECTIVE JUSTIN
MUSELLA
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
KEIVON YOUNG, an individual,
Case No. 5:15-CV-01102-JGB-SP
Plaintiff,
The Hon. District Judge Jesus G.
Bernal, Magistrate, Sheri Pym
14
15
v.
16
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a
17 public entity; SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY SHERIFF, a public entity;
18 DEPUTY NICOLAS NICK
TOLLEFSON, AKA NICHOLAS
19 TOLLEFSON, an individual;
DETECTIVE JUSTIN MUSELLA, an
20 individual; and DOES 1 THROUGH
10, inclusive,
21
Defendant.
22
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR
ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
[NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE
COURT IN ¶¶ 13, 22]
Complaint filed: 6-7-15
23
24
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION of the parties, and Good Cause
25 appearing therefore, and in furtherance of the interests of justice, the Court hereby
26 GRANTS the Protective Order stipulated to by the parties regarding Confidential
27 Documents. Accordingly,
28
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the production, disclosure, sharing,
2 publication, reviewing, copying, retention, and/or dissemination of any and all
3 Confidential Documents, as defined under the parties’ Stipulation for Entry of a
4 Protective Order re Confidential Documents (hereafter as “Stipulation”), shall be
5 prohibited except as specified under the terms and conditions of the parties’
6 aforementioned Stipulation, including the following terms and provisions:
7
8
1.
GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT.
The parties acknowledge that there are certain types of documents that are
9 conceivably discoverable in this action but whose discovery may be complicated or
10 prohibited by issues of confidentiality, intellectual property, work product
11 protections, or various privileges.
For purposes of this Order, "Confidential
12 Materials" include, but are not limited to the following:
13
a.
Any and all police reports, including but not limited to, incident and
14 supplemental reports; crime analysis reports; radio communications; 911 calls;
15 autopsy reports;
16
b.
Any and all police personnel files, including but not limited to, Internal
17 Affairs ("IA") investigation file documents, and comparable official government
18 information;
19
c.
Third party information in police reports, including but not limited to,
20 incident and supplemental reports; crime analysis reports;
21
d.
Personal information, including medical and mental health information,
22
e.
Criminal history information which is not a matter of public record;
23
f.
Educational and professional information;
24
g.
Tax and/or financial records; and comparable records that a party
25 typically treats as confidential in the normal course of business or affairs.
26
2.
In light of the foregoing, the parties further acknowledge that, absent a
27 protective order to limit the use or publication of such documents, in order to preserve
28 the parties' respective interests, the parties might otherwise withhold certain
2
1 documents from production or disclosure, which can then result in costly discovery
2 disputes potentially requiring Court intervention.
3
3.
Defendant, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ("County"), further
4 contends that: (1) absent a court order thereon, police personnel records – including
5 Internal Affairs investigation files and related complaints, statements, and records –
6 are deemed confidential and preserved from disclosure under California state law
7 (e.g., California Penal Code §§ 832.7 and 832.8; California Evidence Code §§ 1040,
8 1043, and 1045); and (2) police personnel records are also deemed confidential by
9 federal decisional law (e.g., Sanchez v. Santa Ana Police Department (9th Cir. 1990)
10 936 F.2d 1027, 1033-1034). Plaintiffs do not necessarily agree with these contentions
11 as stated herein and plaintiff reserves all of plaintiffs’ rights under California and
12 federal law.
13
4.
Therefore, in light of the foregoing, the parties agree that certain types
14 of confidential documents and/or information should be the subject of a protective
15 order. Accordingly, the parties, by and through their attorneys of record in this action,
16 hereby stipulate that good cause exists for a protective order in this matter regarding
17 confidential documents and/or information, and the parties respectfully request the
18 procedural protections listed herein below.
19
5.
By agreeing to designate documents as "confidential " no party is
20 waiving its rights to assert and maintain objections and/or privileges, and by doing so
21 no party is admitting that such materials are subject to discovery or will be produced
22 and/or that such documents are admissible.
23
6.
The parties agree unprotected disclosure of such information may
24 potentially "poison the jury pool", "affect jury service"' and/or cause or contribute to
25 potentially adverse pre-trial publicity. Defendant County also raises personal safety
26 and privacy concerns if such information is made available to the public. Defendant's
27 concerns are exacerbated by the nation’s current social climate and the added
28 concerns officers face in light of the national protests against the police. Adverse
3
1 pretrial publicity can create prejudice in a community and make it impossible for the
2 accused to receive a fair trial. Making the above-listed information publicly available
3 before trial will taint the jury pool and prejudice Defendant's ability to receive a fair
4 trial and put on a defense in this case. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of
5 information, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such
6 material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the
7 end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice and each party's ability to receive
8 a fair trial, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the
9 intent of the parties that such information will not be designated as confidential for
10 tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that there
11 is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. Therefore, a
12 protective order is necessary to prevent any party from disclosing the "confidential"
13 information to the traditional media, internet, or "social media" and to limit the
14 dissemination of the material to those with a true need to know.
15
16
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.
7.
Plaintiffs and Defendant have agreed that the above-listed documents
17 shall be designated confidential documents and/or writings because the Parties
18 believe, in good faith, that some or all of these documents and/or writings are
19 privileged, confidential, private and/or are of a sensitive nature.
20
8.
The confidentiality of documentation being provided pursuant to this
21 Protective Order will be accomplished by affixing to such document or writing a
22 legend, such as "Confidential," "Confidential Documents," "Confidential Material
23 Subject to Protective Order" or words of similar effect. The documents and writings
24 so designated, and all information derived from those documents (collectively
25 referred as "Confidential Information"), shall be treated in accordance with the terms
26 of this stipulation/protective order. The "Confidential" mark or watermark shall not
27 obscure the writings on the document's legibility and shall not be repeated more than
28 once per page.
4
1
9.
Confidential Information may be used by those receiving such
2 information only for the purpose of this above-captioned litigation.
3
10.
Subject to the further conditions imposed by this stipulation/protective
4 order, Confidential Information may be disclosed only to the following people:
5
a.
Counsel for the parties and to experts, investigators, paralegal
6 assistants, office clerks, secretaries and other such personnel working under their
7 supervision;
8
b.
Such other parties as may be agreed by written stipulation among the
9 parties here, or by Court Order;
10
c. Court personnel; and
11
d.
The parties themselves as necessary for the defense or prosecution of
12 this action.
13
11.
Prior to the disclosure of any Confidential Information to any person
14 described in paragraphs a-d , with the exception of all Court Personnel and
15 employees of counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant, counsel for the party that has
16 received and seeks to use or disclose such Confidential Information shall first
17 provide any such person with a copy of this protective order, and shall cause him or
18 her to execute the following acknowledgment:
19
"I understand that I am being given access to Confidential Information
20 pursuant to the foregoing protective order. I have read the stipulation/protective
21 order and agree to be bound by its terms with respect to the handling, use and
22 disclosure of such Confidential Information.
23 Dated: ___________________/s/ ____________________________" \
24
Once this is completed, counsel will serve a copy of the acknowledgment
25 upon counsel for all other parties.
26
12. In the event that a recipient party or counsel contends that any
27 Confidential Documents were already in the possession of that party, or that party's
28 counsel, prior to the date of this Stipulation and Protective Order, or prior to such
5
1 documents' production in this matter by the producing-disclosing party, the recipient
2 party or counsel shall have the burden of proving that any such documents were in
3 fact already in the possession of the recipient party or that party's counsel prior to
4 the date of this Stipulation and Protective Order, or prior to such documents'
5 production in this matter.
6
13.
The parties will attempt to resolve any issue regarding such disputed
7 documents or records pursuant to Local Rule 37.1 before submitting any such
8 dispute-issue to the Court.
9
14.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, and despite any dispute as to whether
10 any documents produced should be subject to the terms of the Stipulation and
11 Protective Order as a result of prior possession, the parties will continue to treat the
12 document(s) at issue as confidential and subject to this Stipulation and Protective
13 Order until the Court rules upon the dispute or until the parties reach agreement on
14 the issue, whichever comes first.
15
15.
If, upon review of such a dispute, the Court determines that the disputed
16 Confidential Documents were already in the possession of the recipient party or
17 counsel prior to the date of this Stipulation and Protective Order, or prior to such
18 documents' production in this matter, those specific documents shall not be subject to
19 paragraph 20's provisions on destruction of copies, nor shall the recipient party or
20 counsel be prohibited from using those specific documents in other litigation:
21 otherwise, the remaining provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order shall
22 continue to apply to such documents as Confidential Documents hereunder.
23
16.
The recipient parties to the above entitled action, and/or their counsel,
24 and/or their agents or the agents or employees of their counsel, shall secure and
25 maintain the confidentiality of any and all Confidential Documents in their
26 possession, and shall ensure that such Confidential Documents are used only for the
27 purposes set forth herein below, and for no other purpose, and subject to the terms
28 and provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order.
6
1
17.
Nothing in this Stipulation and Protective Order shall be construed as a
2 waiver by any party of any right to object on any ground to the use in any proceeding,
3 or to the admission into evidence, of any Confidential Documents. Nothing in this
4 Stipulation and Protective Order shall be construed so as to prevent the admission of
5 Confidential Documents into evidence at the trial of this matter solely on the basis of
6 the documents' designation as Confidential Documents.
7
18.
Nothing in this Stipulation and Protective Order shall be construed as a
8 waiver by any party of any right it would otherwise have to object to disclosing or
9 producing any information or documents on any ground not specifically addressed in
10 this Stipulation and Protective Order, including but not limited to objections pursuant
11 to the California Government Code, California Evidence Code, California Penal
12 Code, the Official Records Privilege, the federal Official Information Privilege, the
13 federal Executive Deliberative Process Privilege, the law enforcement-investigative
14 privilege, the attorney-client privilege, the physician-patient privilege, the therapist15 patient privilege, the attorney work product protection, the taxpayer privilege, or the
16 right to Privacy under the United States Constitution, the California Constitution or
17 any other applicable state or federal authority, or any other privilege against disclosure
18 or production available under any provision of federal or California law. Nothing in
19 this Stipulation and Protective Order shall be construed as requiring the production or
20 disclosure of documents or information that may be or have been designated as
21 Confidential Documents.
22
19.
This Stipulation and Protective Order shall not be construed as a
23 stipulation by any party that any privilege asserted by any party regarding
24 Confidential Documents, whether produced or disclosed or not, is applicable or valid
25 as to such documents; however, all parties, by and through their undersigned counsel,
26 agree to abide by the terms of this Stipulation and Protective Order and to maintain
27 such documents' confidentiality pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation and
28 Protective Order.
7
1
20.
Upon the final termination of this litigation, including any appeal
2 pertaining thereto, all materials that were designated as confidential, as well as any
3 other Court Ordered Documents provided pursuant to this Protective Order and all
4 copies thereof, shall be destroyed and such destruction shall be confirmed by letter to
5 the office of counsel of the party to whom the materials pertain.
6
21.
If any party who receives Confidential Information receives a subpoena
7 or other request seeking Confidential Information, he, she or it shall immediately give
8 written notice to counsel for the party to whom the request pertains, identifying the
9 Confidential Information sought and the time in which production or other disclosure
10 is required, and the affected party shall, per their discretion, object to the request or
11 subpoena on the grounds of this stipulation/protective order, OR other grounds and/or
12 obtain an order barring production or other disclosure, or to otherwise respond to the
13 subpoena or other request for production or disclosure of Confidential Material. No
14 party shall be obligated to seek an order barring production of Confidential
15 Information, which obligation shall be borne by the party to whom to the privileges
16 apply. The duty is to notify. However, in no event should production or disclosure be
17 made without written approval by the affected party's counsel unless required by
18 Court Order arising from a motion to compel production or disclosure of Confidential
19 Information.
20
22.
Any pleadings, motions, briefs, declarations, stipulations, exhibits or
21 other written submissions to the Court in this litigation, except at trial, with which
22 Confidential Information is included shall be subject to a motion or application, at the
23 discretion of any desirous party, to request that the papers, or the confidential portion
24 thereof, be placed under seal by the Court, in accordance with Local Rule 79-5.
25
23. Counsel for the parties further agree that, during any portion of this
26 action, including the pre-trial (e.g. motions in limine) or trial of this action which
27 could entail the discussion or disclosure of Confidential Information, that any party
28 will have an opportunity to request that access to the courtroom be limited to parties,
8
1 their counsel and other designated representative, experts or consultants who agreed
2 to be bound by this stipulation/protective order, and court personnel.
3
24.
Nothing here shall prejudice any party's rights to object to the
4 introduction of any Confidential Information into evidence, on grounds including but
5 not limited to relevance and privilege.
6
25.
The fact that the parties have entered into this stipulation does not waive
7 any of parties' rights to challenge the designation of materials as confidential.
8 Nevertheless, the parties understand and acknowledge that non-public materials
9 contained within personal, financial and/or educational files and records are being
10 provided pursuant to this Protective Order and they are to remain protected by this
11 Order to the extent they were not publicly accessible originally. In the event there is
12 some "good faith" disagreement as to whether certain documents and/or information
13 provided by the parties that were labeled as "confidential" should be treated as
14 confidential, the parties agree to make informal attempts to resolve such issues.
15 However, to be clear, this stipulation and order in no way makes any originally
16 publicly accessible information confidential.
17
26.
The Court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction over this matter to the
18 extent necessary to enforce the terms and /or address alleged breaches of this
19 protective order.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22 Dated: January 22, 2016
23
________________________________
SHERI PYM
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?