Michael Pineda v. Beidler et al

Filing 36

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS AGAINST UNSERVED DEFENDANT SMALE by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The plaintiff shall show good cause in writing, on or before December 21, 2015, why this action should not be dismis sed as against defendant Smale based upon plaintiff's failure to provide the USMS with adequate information to effect timely service of process upon defendant Smale and plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action by timely providing such information and responding to the October Order. See order for further details. (Attachments: # 1 Dismissal Form) (hr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER Michael Pineda, EDCV 15-1162 VBF(JC) Plaintiff(s), v. Beidler, et al. Defendant(s). NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: (Check one) G This action is dismissed by the Plaintiff(s) in its entirety. G The Counterclaim brought by Claimant(s) dismissed by Claimant(s) in its entirety. is G The Cross-Claim brought by Claimants(s) dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety. is G The Third-party Claim brought by Claimant(s) dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety. is G ONLY Defendant(s) Smale First Amended is/are dismissed from (check one) G Complaint, G Counterclaim, G Cross-claim, G Third-Party Claim brought by Plaintiff . The dismissal is made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a) or (c). Date Signature of Attorney/Party NOTE: F.R.Civ.P. 41(a): This notice may be filed at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment, whichever first occurs. F.R.Civ.P. 41(c): Counterclaims, cross-claims & third-party claims may be dismissed before service of a responsive pleading or prior to the beginning of trial. CV-09 (03/10) NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?