Harshod Mehta et al v. City of Upland et al

Filing 60

JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, in favor of City of Upland, Lavelle Brown against Harshod Mehta, Kaushika Mehta: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown and against Plaintiffs Harshad Mehta and Kaushika Mehta. Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown shall recover their costs. (bm)

1
2
SEP 01, 2016

3

B
H

4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

) Case No.: CV15-01164VAP (DTBx)
)
)
) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ERIC WIDEN, an individual; LAVELL )
BROWN, an individual; JAMES
)
HAROLD BELL III, an individual; and )
CITY OF UPLAND, a public entity;
)
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
HARSHAD MEHTA, an individual;
and KAUSHIKA MEHTA, an
individual,

20
21

The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants City of Upland and

22

Officer Lavell Brown came on regularly for hearing on August 22, 2016 at 2:00

23

p.m. in Courtroom 780 of the United States District Court for the Central District

24

of California, the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips, Judge Presiding.

25

After reviewing the moving and opposing papers, as well as the evidence

26

presented in support of and in opposition to the motion, the matter have been duly

27

considered, the issues having been duly heard, and a decision having been duly

28

rendered for Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown,
-1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in

2

favor of Defendants City of Upland and Officer Lavell Brown and against

3

Plaintiffs Harshad Mehta and Kaushika Mehta. Defendants City of Upland and

4

Officer Lavell Brown shall recover their costs.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

DATED: September 01, 2016

__________________________________
HON. VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS
Chief U.S. District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT