Ray A Butler v. County of Riverside et al
Filing
4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Central District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/26/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/1/2015.]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAY A. BUTLER,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
1:15-cv-00959-GSA (PC)
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. ' 1983.
The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity
21
jurisdiction, be brought only in A(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all
22
defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events
23
or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the
24
subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if
25
there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.@ 28 U.S.C. ' 1391(b).
26
In this case, none of the defendants reside in this district. The claim arose in Riverside
27
County, which is in the Central District of California. Therefore, plaintiff=s claim should have
28
been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the interest
1
1
of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct
2
district. See 28 U.S.C. ' 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
3
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United
States District Court for the Central District of California.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 26, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?