Rafael McKinsty v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, et al

Filing 22

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)

Download PDF
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 2 RONALD J. HOLLAND, Cal. Bar No. 148687 3 rholland@sheppardmullin.com JOHN D. ELLIS, Cal. Bar No. 269221 4 jellis@sheppardmullin.com th Four Embarcadero Center, 17 Floor 5 San Francisco, California 94111-4109 Telephone: 415.434.9100 6 Facsimile: 415.434.3947 7 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP PAUL S. COWIE, Cal. Bar No. 250131 8 pcowie@sheppardmullin.com 379 Lytton Ave. 9 Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: 650.815.2600 10 Facsimile: 650.815.2601 11 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP HILARY A. HABIB, Cal Bar No. 293431 12 hhabib@sheppardmullin.com 333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor 13 Los Angeles, California 90071-1422 Telephone: 213.620.1780 14 Facsimile: 213.620.1398 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 RAFAEL MCKINSTY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly 20 situated, Plaintiff, 21 22 Case No. 5:15-cv-01317-VAP-SP Assigned to: Hon. Virginia A. Phillips PROTECTIVE ORDER Complaint Filed: April 15, 2015 v. 23 SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. OF ARIZONA, LLC, a Delaware 24 Corporation, AND DOES 1-100 25 Defendants 26 27 28 Case No. 5:15-cv-01317-VAP-SP PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 FINDING GOOD CAUSE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Rafael 2 Mckinsty and Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC’s Stipulated 3 Protective Order lodged with the Court on January 13, 2017 is approved and hereby 4 adopted as the Order of the Court. 5 6 DATED: January 20, 2017 Honorable Sheri Pym United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:15-cv-01317-VAP-SP -1PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?