Marilyn Sperling v. Stein Mart, Inc. et al.

Filing 117

JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that summary judgment is hereby entered in favor of Stein Mart on all counts 100 , that Plaintiffs Marilyn Sperling and Jerred Schuh shall take nothing by this action, and that Plaintiffs' case shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set forth in this Court's 2/23/2018 order, which was entered on 2/26/2018. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
1 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 MARILYN SPERLING and JERRED Case No.: 5:15-cv-01411-AB-KK SCHUH, individuals; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 15 Plaintiff, 16 vs. 17 18 STEIN MART, INC. 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28   Judge: Hon. André Birotte, Jr. 1 Defendant Stein Mart Inc. (“Stein Mart”) has moved for summary judgment 2 in the above-captioned matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, 3 seeking to dismiss with prejudice this case in its entirety. After fully considering 4 the arguments and evidence presented, this Court granted Stein Mart’s motion on 5 February 23, 2018 [see Docket Entry No. 114]. 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT 7 summary judgment is hereby entered in favor of Stein Mart on all counts, that 8 Plaintiffs Marilyn Sperling and Jerred Schuh shall take nothing by this action, and 9 that Plaintiffs’ case shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons 10 set forth in this Court’s February 23, 2018 order, which was entered on February 11 26, 2018. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 23, 2018 ________________________________ The Honorable André Birotte Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?