William Jellis v. County of Riverside et al
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a) by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 31 . (kh)
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
ARTHUR K. CUNNINGHAM, SB# 97506
2 STEPHANIE J. TANADA, SB# 257769
650 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 600
3 San Bernardino, California 92408
Telephone: 909.387.1130
4 Facsimile: 909.387.1138
5 Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION
11
12 WILLIAM JELLIS,
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
15 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al.,
Defendants.
16
CASE NO. 5:15-CV-1944-DSF (JCG)
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO
FRCP 41(a)
Trial Date:
None Set
17
18
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND THE PARTIES HAVING
19 STIPULATED THERETO, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
20
1.
The Complaint, in its entirety and as to each and every claim for relief
21 and any and all defendants, is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of
22 Civil Procedure 41(a).
23
2.
The settlement is further memorialized in a written settlement
24 agreement.
25
3.
The parties shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees
26 arising out of and/or connected with this matter, including any such fees or expenses
27 potentially recoverable under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1988, except for those specifically
LEWI
S
BRISBOI
S
28 negotiated for and previously agreed in writing prior to the execution of this
4822-9029-1776.1
1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?