William Jellis v. County of Riverside et al

Filing 32

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a) by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 31 . (kh)

Download PDF
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ARTHUR K. CUNNINGHAM, SB# 97506 2 STEPHANIE J. TANADA, SB# 257769 650 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 600 3 San Bernardino, California 92408 Telephone: 909.387.1130 4 Facsimile: 909.387.1138 5 Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 WILLIAM JELLIS, Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 15 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants. 16 CASE NO. 5:15-CV-1944-DSF (JCG) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a) Trial Date: None Set 17 18 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND THE PARTIES HAVING 19 STIPULATED THERETO, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 20 1. The Complaint, in its entirety and as to each and every claim for relief 21 and any and all defendants, is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of 22 Civil Procedure 41(a). 23 2. The settlement is further memorialized in a written settlement 24 agreement. 25 3. The parties shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees 26 arising out of and/or connected with this matter, including any such fees or expenses 27 potentially recoverable under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1988, except for those specifically LEWI S BRISBOI S 28 negotiated for and previously agreed in writing prior to the execution of this 4822-9029-1776.1 1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?