Alfred Zaklit et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Filing
128
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder:Upon entry of this Order, compensation to the participating Settlement Class Members shall be effected pursuant to the terms of the Settlement. Court hereby approves the payment of a Service Awardto Plaintiffs, in the amount of $10,000 per Class Representative (Alfred Zaklit, Jessy Zaklit).The Court approves the payment of attorneys fees to Class Counsel in the sum of $1,625,000.00 , and the reimbursement of litigation expenses in thesum of $25,046.52.The Court approves and orders payment in an amount commensurate with Epiq Systems, Inc.s actual costs, and not to exceed $200,000.00 to Epiq Systems, Inc. for performance of its settlement claims administration services. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT
8
THE LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, PC
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ALFRED ZAKLIT AND JESSY
ZAKLIT, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
13
16
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiffs,
14
15
Case No 5:15-CV-02190-CAS-KK
vs.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and
each of them,
17
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS
ACTION SETTLEMENT AND
FINAL JUDGMENT
Assigned to the Hon. Christina A. Snyder
18
19
20
Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for an Order Granting Final Approval of Class
21
Action Settlement, Conditionally Certifying Proposed Settlement Class, Approving
22
Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, and granting Incentive Award (“Motion”).
23
Having reviewed the Motion and supporting materials, the Court determines and
24
orders as follows:
On
25
March 4, 2019 this Court entered an Order Granting Preliminary
26
Approval of Settlement, resulting in certification of the following provisional
27
Settlement Class:
28
///
80001.0038/14337102 1 [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT
PAGE 1 OF 6
1
“All individuals who, from October 23, 2014 to May 1, 2016, while
2
physically present in California and using a cellular device with a
3
California area code, participated for the first time in an outbound
4
telephone conversation with a representative of Defendant or its
5
agent who were recording the conversation without first informing
6
the individual that the conversation was being recorded. ”
Membership in the Settlement Class consists exclusively of individuals provided
8
by Defendants to the Settlement Administrator, as set forth in the Agreement.
9
THE LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, PC
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367
7
The Court further approved the form of, and directed the parties to provide, the
10
proposed Class Notice to the Class, which informed Settlement Class Members of:
11
(a) the proposed Settlement, and the Settlement’s key terms; (b) the date, time, and
12
location of the Final Approval Hearing; (c) the right of any Settlement Class
13
Member to object to the proposed Settlement, and an explanation of the procedures
14
to exercise that right; (d) the right of any Settlement Class Member to exclude
15
themselves from the proposed Settlement; and an explanation of the procedures to
16
exercise that right; and (e) an explanation of the procedures for Settlement Class
17
Members to participate in the proposed Settlement.
18
No objections have been made, timely or otherwise, pursuant to the Class
19
Notice sent to the Settlement Class members, nor did any objectors appear at the
20
time of the hearing.
21
This matter having come before the Court for hearing pursuant to the Order
22
of this Court dated August 19, 2019, for approval of the settlement set forth in the
23
Settlement Agreement and Release ( “Settlement”), and due and adequate notice
24
having been given to the Settlement Class Members as required in said Order, and
25
the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and
26
otherwise being fully informed of the promises and good cause appearing therefore,
27
it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
28
80001.0038/14337102 1 [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT
PAGE 2 OF 6
1
2
3
4
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over all
of the parties to the Action.
2. The Court finds that the Settlement Class is properly certified as a class for
settlement purposes only.
3. The Class Notice provided to the Settlement Class conforms with the
6
requirements of Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23, the California and United States
7
Constitutions, and any other applicable law, and constitutes the best notice
8
practicable under the circumstances, by providing individual notice to all
9
THE LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, PC
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367
5
Settlement Class Members who could be identified through reasonable effort,
10
and by providing due and adequate notice of the proceedings and of the
11
matters set forth therein to the other Settlement Class Members. The notice
12
fully satisfied the requirements of Due Process. No Settlement Class Members
13
have objected to the terms of the Settlement.
14
15
4. Only two Settlement Class Members have requested exclusion from the
Settlement.
16
5. The Court finds that Defendant properly and timely notified the appropriate
17
government officials of the Settlement Agreement, pursuant to the Class
18
Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1715. The Court has
19
reviewed the substance of Defendant’s notice, and finds that it complied
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
with all applicable requirements of CAFA. Further, more than ninety (90)
days have elapsed since Defendant provided notice pursuant to CAFA and
the Final Approval Hearing.
6. The Court finds the Settlement was entered into in good faith, that the
settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate, and that the Settlement satisfies
the standards and applicable requirements for final approval of this class
action settlement under California law, including the provisions of Fed. Rule
Civ. Proc. 23. The Court finds that the consideration to be paid to members
of the Settlement Class is reasonable and in the best interests of the
28
80001.0038/14337102 1 [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT
PAGE 3 OF 6
1
Settlement Class Members considering the disputed facts and circumstances
2
of and affirmative defenses asserted in the Action and the potential risks and
3
likelihood of success of pursuing litigation on the merits.
4
5
6
7
8
THE LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, PC
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367
9
10
11
7. The Court finds that the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure are satisfied with request to the settlement. The
Class representatives and class counsel have adequately represented the
class, as demonstrated by their efforts in certifying the class by contested
motion after significant formal discovery and motion practice. The Court
found that these requirements were satisfied in its July 24, 2017 Order
granting Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. Dkt. No. 74. Based on
the record before the Court, The Court is persuaded that these
requirements continue to be satisfied. Further, the settlement was
12
negotiated at arm’s length, with the assistance of experienced mediator
13
Hon. Louis M. Meisinger (ret.), and over the course of several months of
14
subsequent negotiations, conducted with the oversight and assistance of
15
Judge Meisinger. The Court further finds that the relief provided to the
16
class is adequate, fair and reasonable taking into account the costs, risks
17
and delay of trial and appeal. Defendant articulated several bases upon
18
which it planned to mount a vigorous defense, including contesting
19
plaintiffs’ claims at trial and filing potential appeals. Plaintiffs and Class
20
Counsel adequately and appropriately considered these risks in
21
negotiating a settlement. Additionally, the method of distributing relief to
22
the class, by giving direct notice by mail, and creating a pro rata
23
24
25
26
27
28
distribution of a common fund without reversion, is a method of
distribution and settlement that is commonly accepted by courts, including
by This Court, as satisfying the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2). The terms
of the proposed award of attorney’s fees are fair and determined to be fair
and reasonable, given the length of time in litigation, and the results
achieved. The timing of payment is fair because fees and costs will be
80001.0038/14337102 1 [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT
PAGE 4 OF 6
1
paid out of a common fund, at the same time as the remainder of the class
2
members. Finally, the settlement puts all class members on equal footing,
3
which is appropriate under the facts of this case, which involves the same
4
statutory damages awarded to each class member. Accordingly, the Court
5
6
7
8
THE LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, PC
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367
9
10
11
finds that the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2) are satisfied.
8. The Court has specifically considered the factors relevant to class settlement
approval (see, e.g., Churchill Vill., L.L.C. v. Gen. Elec., 361 F.3d 566 (9th
Cir. 2004))—including, inter alia, the strength of Plaintiff’s case; the risk,
expense, complexity, and likely duration of further litigation; the risk of not
maintaining class action status throughout trial; the relief provided for in the
settlement; the extent of discovery completed and stage of the proceedings;
the experience and views of counsel; and the reaction of the Settlement
12
Class Members to the proposed settlement (including the claims submitted
13
and lack of any opt-outs or objections)—and upon consideration of such
14
factors finds that the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate to all
15
concerned.
16
9. Accordingly, the Settlement is hereby finally approved in all respects, and the
17
Parties are hereby directed to implement and consummate the Settlement
18
Agreement according to its terms and provisions.
19
10. The terms of the Settlement Agreement and of this Final Order, including all
20
exhibits thereto, shall be forever binding in all pending and future lawsuits
21
maintained by the Named Plaintiff and all other Settlement Class Members,
22
as well as their family members, heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns.
23
11. Upon entry of this Order, compensation to the participating Settlement Class
24
Members shall be effected pursuant to the terms of the Settlement.
25
12. In addition to any recovery that Plaintiffs may receive under the Settlement,
26
and in recognition of the Plaintiffs’ efforts and risks taken on behalf of the
27
Settlement Class, the Court hereby approves the payment of a Service Award
28
to Plaintiffs, in the amount of $10,000 per Class Representative.
80001.0038/14337102 1 [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT
PAGE 5 OF 6
1
13. The Court approves the payment of attorneys’ fees to Class Counsel in the
2
sum of $1,625,000.00, and the reimbursement of litigation expenses in the
3
sum of $25,046.52
14. The Court approves and orders payment in an amount commensurate with
5
Epiq Systems, Inc.’s actual costs, and not to exceed $200,000 to Epiq
6
Systems, Inc. for performance of its settlement claims administration services.
7
15. Upon the Effective Date, the Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members,
8
[except the excluded individuals referenced in paragraph 4 of this Order], shall
9
THE LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, PC
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367
4
have, by operation of this Order and the accompanying Judgment, fully,
10
finally and forever released, relinquished, and discharged Defendant from all
11
claims or liabilities arising from or related to the facts, circumstances or
12
subject matter of this Action, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Upon
13
the Effective Date, all Settlement Class Members shall be and are hereby
14
permanently barred and enjoined from the institution or prosecution of any
15
and all Released Claims that are released under the terms of the Settlement.
16
This Lawsuit and all claims of Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members
17
are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
18
Settlement Class Members are hereby barred and permanently enjoined from
19
(a) filing, commencing, prosecuting, intervening in, promoting, or
20
participating (as class members or otherwise) in any lawsuit in any jurisdiction
21
based on or arising out of the claims and causes of action, or the facts and
22
circumstances relating thereto, in this Action; and (b) organizing Settlement
23
Class Members who have not been excluded from the Settlement Class into a
24
separate class for purposes of pursuing as a purported class action any lawsuit
25
(including by seeking to amend a pending complaint to include class
26
allegations, or seeking class certification in a pending action) based on or
27
relating to the claims and causes of action, or the facts and circumstances
28
relating thereto, in this Action.
80001.0038/14337102 1 [PROPOSED]
Furthermore, Plaintiffs and all
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT
PAGE 6 OF 6
1
16. This Final Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits
2
thereto) may be filed in any action against or by any Released Party (as that
3
term is defined herein and the Settlement Agreement) to support a defense of
4
res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar
5
or reduction, or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar
6
defense or counterclaim.
17. This Order, the Settlement, and any and all negotiations, statements,
8
documents, and/or proceedings in connection with this Settlement are not, and
9
THE LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, PC
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367
7
shall not be construed as, an admission by Defendant of any liability or
10
wrongdoing in this or in any other proceeding.
11
18. Upon completion of administration of the Settlement, the Parties shall file a
12
declaration setting forth that claims have been paid and that the terms of the
13
Settlement have been completed.
14
15
19. This Judgment is intended to be a final disposition of the above captioned
action in its entirety, and is intended to be immediately appealable.
16
20. This Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters related to the
17
administration and consummation of the settlement, and any and all claims,
18
asserted in, arising out of, or related to the subject matter of the lawsuit,
19
including but not limited to all matters related to the Settlement and the
20
determination of all controversies related thereto.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: August 21, 2019
24
_
Honorable Christina A. Snyder
United States District Court Judge
25
26
27
28
80001.0038/14337102 1 [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT
PAGE 7 OF 6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?