William Horace Eisenhower Jr v. Cynthia Tampkins
Filing
22
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge and Denying Certificate of Appealability by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; Judgment be ent ered dismissing this action with prejudice; and The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. (lwag)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
WILLIAM H. EISENHOWER, JR.,
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
15
CYNTHIA TAMPKINS, Warden,
Respondent.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. ED CV 15-2446 FMO (JCG)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate
19
Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de
20
novo determination. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been
21
filed.
22
23
//
24
25
//
26
27
//
28
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
3
1.
The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
4
2.
Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice; and
5
3.
The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
6
Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the
7
Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
8
constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v.
9
Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of
10
appealability.
11
12
13
14
DATED: August 31, 2017
/s/
HON. FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?