William Horace Eisenhower Jr v. Cynthia Tampkins

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation and the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge and Denying Certificate of Appealability. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WILLIAM H. EISENHOWER, JR., Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA TAMPKINS, Warden, Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ED CV 15-2446 FMO (JCG) JUDGMENT IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge and Denying Certificate of Appealability. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: August 31, 2017 /s/ HON. FERNANDO M. OLGUIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?