David Sanchez v. Riverside County Code Enforcement Agency et al

Filing 47

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT REVOKE PLAINTIFFS ELECTRONIC FILING PRIVILEGES by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, i.e., by not later than April 14, 2017, plaintiff shall show good cause, if there be any, why he has not complied with Local Rule 5-4.1.1 and why his e-filing privileges should not be revoked. (dml)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. EDCV 15-2493 SJO(JC) Title David Sanchez v. Riverside County Code Enforcement Agency, et al Present: The Honorable Date April 4, 2017 Jacqueline Chooljian, United States Magistrate Judge Donnamarie Luengo, Relief None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: none none Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S ELECTRONIC FILING PRIVILEGES On February 23, 2017, plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed an “Application for Permission for Electronic Filing” (“Plaintiff’s Application”). On February 24, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Application (“February Order”). The February Order, in bold-faced print, expressly (1) reminded plaintiff that pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.1.1, he must register to use the Court’s CM/ECF System within five days of being served with the February Order and that if he did not already have a PACER account, he must establish one within the same five-day period; and (2) cautioned plaintiff that his failure to comply with Local Rule 5-4.1.1 or his unsatisfactory use of the CM/ECF system, may result in the revocation of his e-filing privileges which would mean that he would be required to file documents in paper, but would continue to receive documents via e-mail. The February Order was mailed to plaintiff’s address of record on or about the date it was issued. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to date, plaintiff has failed to register to use the Court’s CM/ECF System and to establish a PACER account as required by Local Rule 5-4.1.1. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, i.e., by not later than April 14, 2017, plaintiff shall show good cause, if there be any, why he has not complied with Local Rule 5-4.1.1 and why his e-filing privileges should not be revoked. Failure timely to respond to this Order to Show Cause and/or to show good cause may result in the revocation of plaintiff’s e-filing privileges (which would mean that he would be required to file documents in paper, but would continue to receive documents via e-mail) and/or in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with the Court’s order and/or the failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Initials of Deputy Clerk: dl CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?