Josefina Avila Pacheco v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA") in the amount of TWO THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR DOLLARS and 57/cents ($2,264.57), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation 20 . (afe)

Download PDF
WILLIAM M. KUNTZ # 153052 Attorney at Law 2 4780 Arlington Avenue Riverside, CA 92504 3 (951) 343-3400 Fax (951) 343-4004 4 E-Mail: KuntzSSlaw @sbcglobal.net Attorney for Plaintiff 1 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CASE NO.: EDCV 15-02501 AS JOSEFINA AVILA PACHECO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security ) Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________ ) [PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees (“Stipulation”), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the 21 Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA”) in the amount of TWO THOUSAND TWO 22 HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR DOLLARS and 57/cents ($2,264.57), as authorized by 23 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. 24 25 DATED: June 19, 2017 26 __________________________________ /s/ HONORABLE ALKA SAGAR UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 1 28 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Wolvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?