Jeffery Van Haren et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

Filing 43

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 42 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey Van Haren JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) CAITLIN M. WANG (Cal. State Bar No. 311901) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com caitlinmarianwang@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 JEFFREY VAN HAREN and MICHAEL MIKLOVICH, 20 Plaintiffs, 21 22 23 24 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Dept.: vs. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 25 No. 5:15-CV-02503-MWF-(JEMX) Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald 5A Complaint Filed: May 18, 2015 Trial Date: June 26, 2018 Defendants. 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. C.D. CAL. NO. 5:15-CV-02503-MWF-(JEMX) LEGAL_US_W # 93205164.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH 3 PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 6 Dated: March 13, 2018. Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. C.D. CAL. NO. 5:15-CV-02503-MWF-(JEMX) LEGAL_US_W # 93205164.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?