Joseph Daniel Ramos v. Raymond Madden

Filing 38

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 24 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice. (iva)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JOSEPH DANIEL RAMOS, Petitioner, 11 v. 12 13 Case No. ED CV 15-02519-VBF (KK) RAYMOND MADDEN, Respondent. 14 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has 18 reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the 19 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has 20 engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has 21 objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate 22 Judge. 23 In his objections to the Report, Petitioner also requests an evidentiary 24 hearing. However, in habeas proceedings, “an evidentiary hearing is not required 25 on issues that can be resolved by reference to the state court record.” Totten v. 26 Merkle, 137 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 1998); see also Earp v. Ornoski, 431 F.3d 27 1158, 1173 (9th Cir. 2005). “It is axiomatic that when issues can be resolved with 28 reference to the state court record, an evidentiary hearing becomes nothing more 1 than a futile exercise.” Totten, 137 F.3d at 1176. Here, the Magistrate Judge 2 concluded all of Petitioner’s claims could be resolved by reference to the state 3 court record. Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary 4 hearing. 5 6 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice. 7 8 Dated: January 18, 2017 9 10 HON. VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?