James Fredric Jones v. Stu Sherman

Filing 20

ORDER ACCEPTING AS MODIFIED FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 16 . (mz)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES FREDERIC JONES, Petitioner, 12 ORDER ACCEPTING AS MODIFIED v. 13 14 Case No. EDCV 15-2558 DMG (SS) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND JOSEPH W. MOSS, Chief, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES Respondent. 15 MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the 19 Petition, Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition, all of the 20 records 21 Recommendation, and Petitioner’s Objections. 22 de 23 Recommendation 24 accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations 25 of the Magistrate Judge, as modified to expressly reflect that 26 Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is granted. 27 \\ 28 \\ novo and files herein, determination to which of the the Magistrate portions Objections were Judge’s Report and After having made a of the directed, Report the and Court 1 2 IT IS ORDERED IS FURTHER that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Petition is DENIED is GRANTED. 3 4 IT 5 Judgment 6 ORDERED that the and prejudice. shall be entered dismissing this action without 7 8 The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve copies of this 9 Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner at his address of 10 record and on counsel for Respondent. 11 12 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 13 14 DATED: September 9, 2016 15 16 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?