James Fredric Jones v. Stu Sherman
Filing
20
ORDER ACCEPTING AS MODIFIED FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 16 . (mz)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES FREDERIC JONES,
Petitioner,
12
ORDER ACCEPTING AS MODIFIED
v.
13
14
Case No. EDCV 15-2558 DMG (SS)
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
JOSEPH W. MOSS, Chief,
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES
Respondent.
15
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the
19
Petition, Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition, all of the
20
records
21
Recommendation, and Petitioner’s Objections.
22
de
23
Recommendation
24
accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations
25
of the Magistrate Judge, as modified to expressly reflect that
26
Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is granted.
27
\\
28
\\
novo
and
files
herein,
determination
to
which
of
the
the
Magistrate
portions
Objections
were
Judge’s
Report
and
After having made a
of
the
directed,
Report
the
and
Court
1
2
IT
IS
ORDERED
IS
FURTHER
that
Respondent’s
Motion
to
Dismiss
Petition
is
DENIED
is
GRANTED.
3
4
IT
5
Judgment
6
ORDERED
that
the
and
prejudice.
shall
be
entered
dismissing
this
action
without
7
8
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve copies of this
9
Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner at his address of
10
record and on counsel for Respondent.
11
12
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
13
14
DATED:
September 9, 2016
15
16
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?