Derrick Byrd v. Masonite Corporation et al

Filing 57

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) re: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Stipulation for Protective Order 56 The parties are advised that the Court declinesto issue the proposed protective order to which they have stipulated (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) (dts)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No.

EDCV 16-35-JGB (KKx)

Date: September 7, 2016

Title: Derrick Byrd v. Masonite Corporation, et al.

Present: The Honorable KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEB TAYLOR

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Present

None Present

Proceedings:

Order re: Stipulated Protective Order [Dkt. 56]

The parties’ proposed Stipulation and Protective Order has been referred by the District
Judge to the Magistrate Judge for consideration. The parties are advised that the Court declines
to issue the proposed protective order to which they have stipulated for the following reasons:
1.
The stipulation needs to be revised to make clear that the terms of the Protective
Order do not apply to the Court and court personnel, who are subject only to the Court’s internal
procedures regarding the handling of material filed or lodged, including material filed or lodged
under seal.
2.
Proposed ¶ 6.1 must be revised to make clear that any challenges to a designation
of confidentiality may be made at any time that is consistent with the Court’s Scheduling Order.
3.
Proposed ¶ 6.2 needs to be revised to make clear that any motion challenging a
designation of confidentiality or seeking to modify or amend the proposed Protective Order must
be brought in strict compliance with Local Rules 37-1 and 37-2 (including the Joint Stipulation
requirement).
4.
Proposed ¶ 11(g) needs to be revised to make clear a Party that seeks to file under
seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may
only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected
Page 1 of 2

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Initials of Deputy Clerk __

Material at issue. If a Party’s request to file Protected Material under seal is denied by the court,
then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed
by the court.
The parties are further directed to the Court’s sample stipulated protective order located
on the Court’s website for a sample of the format of an approved stipulated protective order.
The parties are strongly encouraged to use the language contained in the approved stipulated
protective order.

cc:

United States District Judge Jesus G. Bernal

Page 2 of 2

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Initials of Deputy Clerk __