Albert Torres v. James Hardie Building Products Inc.

Filing 20

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order DENYING Motion to Remand; Order DENYING Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 8, 12, 16) by Judge Dale S. Fischer: The motion for remand is DENIED. While the amount in the notice of removal is close to the $5,000,000 CAFA thre shold, Defendant's calculations are reasonable, if not conservative, and they are based on competent evidence. Defendant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy is over the jurisdiction limit. The motion to dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff has provided a short and plain statement that recites the acts at issue. That is all that is required. (bp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM Case No. Title Date EDCV 16-138 DSF (KKx) 3/15/16 Albert Torres v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc. Present: The Honorable DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge Debra Plato Deputy Clerk Not Present Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order DENYING Motion to Remand; Order DENYING Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 8, 12, 16)1 The motion for remand is DENIED. While the amount in the notice of removal is close to the $5,000,000 CAFA threshold, Defendant’s calculations are reasonable, if not conservative, and they are based on competent evidence. Defendant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy is over the jurisdictional limit. The motion to dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff has provided a short and plain statement that recites the acts at issue. That is all that is required. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The hearing set for March 21, 2016 is removed from the Court’s calendar. CV-90 (12/02) MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?