Eddy Soriano et al v. County of Riverside et al

Filing 108

ORDER on Stipulation for Dismissal 107 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that this entire action, and all of the following remaini ng defendants in the above-captioned action be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) effective as of 8/31/2017: Defendants COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; STANLEY SNIFF; WILLIAM DI YORIO; JULIO IBARRA; JERRY GUTIERREZ; VIRGINIA BUS BY; NORMAN NANTES; JASON CHIVAS; JEFFREY PINION; and CHRISTOPHER ALVAREZ. IT IS ALSO STIPULATED that Plaintiffs and the Riverside Defendants shall each bear their own costs and attorneys fees. that in the event that the settlement funds do not clear the Trujillo and Trujillo Client Trust Account on 8/14/2017 as anticipated, the parties may file a Further Joint Status Report with this Court for purposes of seeking a later date of dismissal of the entire action to allow for sufficient time for the settlement funds to clear. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 TRUJILLO & TRUJILLO, APLC Robert Trujillo, Esq. (CA SBN 148975) Melody Trujillo, Esq. (CA SBN 165218) 41593 Winchester Road, Suite 201 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: 951-296-9529 Email: trulaw@trujillo-law.us 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Suzanne Skolnick, Esq. (CA SBN 211076) 2888 Loker Avenue East, Suite 110-F Carlsbad, CA 92010 Tel. (760) 405-4397 Email: suzanne@skolnicklawgroup.com Lewis Khashan, Esq. (CA SBN 275906) 38975 Sky Canyon Drive Suite 201 Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel. (951) 775-7279 Email: lewis@khashanlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Eddy Soriano, By and through his conservator, Sherly Tolentino, et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Eddy Soriano, by and through his ) Case No. 5:16-cv-155 BRO (SP) Conservator, Sherly Tolentino; Marites ) ORDER ON de Guzman; , ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL ) OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF ) RIVERSIDE; STANLEY SNIFF; Plaintiffs, ) WILLIAM DI YORIO; JULIO v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; CITY OF ) IBARRA; JERRY GUTIERREZ; ) VIRGINIA BUSBY; NORMAN MURRIETA; STANLEY SNIFF, ) NANTES; JASON CHIVAS; Sheriff of Riverside County; WILLIAM DI YORIO, Undersheriff of ) JEFFREY PINION; and ) CHRISTOPHER ALVAREZ Riverside County; JULIO IBARRA, ) EFFECTIVE AS OF AUGUST 31, Senior Safety Coordinator for 1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICERS CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-155 BRO (SP) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Riverside County; JERRY GUTIERREZ, Corrections Assistant Sheriff; VIRGINIA BUSBY, Captain of Robert Presley Detention Center; Correctional Deputy NORMAN NANTES; Correctional Deputy JASON CHIVAS; Correctional Deputy JEFFREY PINION; Correctional Deputy CHRISTOPHER ALVAREZ Murrieta Police Department OFFICER JEREMY MEADOWS; OFFICER H. ADAMS; OFFICER ELLIOT; OFFICER TOMPKINS; OFFICER MATTHEW MOZINGO; OFFICER IRVING; TYLER SCOTT JACKSON; and DOES 1-125, Defendants. ) 2017. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 14 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s Petition for Compromise to obtain the Probate 15 Court’s approval of the settlement of this matter with the remaining Defendants in 16 17 18 19 20 this matter, namely: Defendants County of Riverside; Stanley Sniff; William DiYorio; Julio Ibarra; Jerry Gutierrez; Virginia Busby; Norman Nantes; Jason Chivas; Jeffrey Pinion; and Christopher Alvarez (hereafter the “Riverside 21 Defendants”) was heard on July 12, 2017 in Dept. 67 of the Los Angeles County 22 Superior Court. 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS the Petition for Compromise was approved by the Probate court at the hearing on July 12, 2017. WHEREAS the settlement funds payable to Plaintiff by the Riverside Defendants was received by Plaintiff’s counsel on August 2, 2017 and deposited 2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICERS CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-155 BRO (SP) 1 2 3 to the Trujillo & Trujillo Client Trust Account on August 2, 2017. WHEREAS a hold has been placed on the settlement funds by the bank for 4 the client trust account until August 14, 2017, after which time, the settlement 5 funds will have cleared the client trust account. 6 7 NOW THEREFORE, 8 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 through their designated counsel that this entire action, and all of the following remaining defendants in the above-captioned action be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) effective as of August 31, 2017: Defendants COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; STANLEY SNIFF; WILLIAM DI YORIO; JULIO IBARRA; JERRY GUTIERREZ; VIRGINIA BUSBY; NORMAN NANTES; JASON CHIVAS; JEFFREY PINION; and CHRISTOPHER ALVAREZ. IT IS ALSO STIPULATED that Plaintiffs and the Riverside Defendants shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS ALSO STIPULATED that in the event that the settlement funds do not 23 24 clear the Trujillo & Trujillo Client Trust Account on August 14, 2017 as 25 anticipated, the parties may file a Further Joint Status Report with this Court for 26 27 28 purposes of seeking a later date of dismissal of the entire action to allow for sufficient time for the settlement funds to clear. 3 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICERS CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-155 BRO (SP) 1 2 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: August 8, 2017 /s/_Robert Trujillo_____________ Robert Trujillo, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs, Eddy Soriano by and through his Conservator, Sherly Tolentino and Marites De Guzman 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: August 8, 2017 __/s/ Arthur K. Cunningham_____ Attorney for Defendants County of Riverside, Stanley Sniff, William Di Yorio, Julio Ibarra, Jerry Gutierrez, Virginia Busby, Norman Nantes, Jason Chivas, Jeffrey Pinion and Christopher Alvarez 13 14 15 16 August 9, 2017 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICERS CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-155 BRO (SP)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?