Luis Ortiz v. Exel Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson: The Court, having considered Luis Ortiz's and Exel Inc.'s (the "Parties") stipulation to for dismissal with prejudice of all claims brought by PlaintiffLuis Ortiz, hereby ORDERS the case dismissed with prejudice, effective October3, 2016. All hearings on calendar, if any, are hereby advanced to this date and vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED.Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cr)

JS-6
1 AEGIS LAW FIRM, PC
KASHIF HAQUE, State Bar No. 218672
2 ALI S. CARLSEN, State Bar No. 289964
9811 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 100
3 Irvine, California 92618
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
5 [e-mail]
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff,
LUIS ORTIZ
7
CHRISTOPHER J. BOMAN, SBN 198798
8 Email: [e-mail]
LIZBETH OCHOA, SBN 219985
9 Email: [e-mail]
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
10 2050 Main Street, Suite 1000
Irvine, California 92614
11 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
12
Attorneys for Defendant,
13 EXEL INC.
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION

16
17 LUIS ORTIZ, an individual,
Plaintiff,

18
19

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00191-PA-DTB
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

vs.

20 EXEL INC., a Massachusetts
corporation; and DOES 1 through 20
21 inclusive,
22

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1
2

ORDER
The Court, having considered Luis Ortiz’s and Exel Inc.’s (the “Parties”)

3 stipulation to for dismissal with prejudice of all claims brought by Plaintiff
4 Luis Ortiz, hereby ORDERS the case dismissed with prejudice, effective October
5 3, 2016.
6

All hearings on calendar, if any, are hereby advanced to this date and vacated.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10
11

Dated: October 3

, 2016
Hon. Percy Anderson
District Court Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE