Sream, Inc. v. Sanrah, Inc., et al.
Filing
18
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: That judgment be entered in favor of Sream against Khawaldeh on all claims. Khawaldeh, and those acting on Khawaldeh& #039;s behalf (including its owners, shareholders, principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, independent contractors, and partners), are permanently enjoined. The Parties waive any rights to appeal this stipulated judgment, including without limitation the Injunction. (jp)
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
1
2
3
4
This Court, having made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law
pursuant to the parties’ stipulation:
A.
Plaintiff Sream, Inc. (“Sream” or “Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendant
5
YOUSUF A. KHAWALDEH (“Khawaldeh”), alleging that Khawaldeh violated Sream’s
6
rights under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1116, 1125(a), (c), and (d), and Cal. Bus & Prof. § 17200
7
et seq. (“Action”);
8
9
10
11
B.
The Parties entered into a settlement agreement as of March 2016 (“Settlement
Agreement”), which requires entry of the stipulated judgment set forth herein;
And good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
AND DECREED THAT:
12
1.
That judgment be entered in favor of Sream against Khawaldeh on all claims.
13
2.
For the purposes of binding preclusive effect on Khawaldeh as to future
14
disputes between Khawaldeh and Sream, and only for such purposes, Khawaldeh admits
15
the following:
16
a. Mr. Martin Birzle is now, and has been at all times since the dates of issuance,
17
the owner of United States Trademark Registration Nos. 2,235,638; 2,307,176;
18
and 3,675,839 (the “RooR Marks”) and of all rights thereto and thereunder.
19
b. The RooR Marks are valid and enforceable.
20
c. Since at least 2013, Plaintiff Sream has been the exclusive licensee of the
21
RooR Marks in the United States. Mr. Birzle has been granted all
22
enforcement rights to Sream to sue for obtain injunctive and monetary relief
23
for past and future infringement of the RooR Marks.
d. Khawaldeh, by the actions described in the complaint, has infringed upon the
24
RooR Marks.
25
26
3.
Khawaldeh, and those acting on Khawaldeh’s behalf (including its owners,
27
shareholders, principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, independent contractors, and
28
partners), are permanently enjoined from producing, manufacturing, distributing, selling,
3
JUDGMENT
1
offer for sale, advertising, promoting, licensing, or marketing (a) any product bearing the
2
RooR Marks or (b) any design, mark, or feature that is confusingly similar to the RooR
3
Marks (collectively, the “Injunction”).
4
4.
Khawaldeh is bound by the Injunction regardless of whether Mr. Martin Birzle
5
assigns or licenses its intellectual property rights to another for so long as such trademark
6
rights are subsisting, valid, and enforceable. The Injunction inures to the benefit of Mr.
7
Martin Birzle’s successors, assignees, and licensees.
8
9
5.
This Court (or if this Court is unavailable, any court within the Central District
of California) shall retain jurisdiction over all disputes between and among the Parties
10
arising out of the Settlement Agreement and Injunction, the Stipulation which includes the
11
Injunction, and this final judgment, including but not limited to interpretation and
12
enforcement of the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
13
14
6.
The Parties waive any rights to appeal this stipulated judgment, including
without limitation the Injunction.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
Dated: April 5, 2016
20
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?