Sream, Inc. v. Sanrah, Inc., et al.

Filing 18

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: That judgment be entered in favor of Sream against Khawaldeh on all claims. Khawaldeh, and those acting on Khawaldeh& #039;s behalf (including its owners, shareholders, principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, independent contractors, and partners), are permanently enjoined. The Parties waive any rights to appeal this stipulated judgment, including without limitation the Injunction. (jp)

Download PDF
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1 2 3 4 This Court, having made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to the parties’ stipulation: A. Plaintiff Sream, Inc. (“Sream” or “Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendant 5 YOUSUF A. KHAWALDEH (“Khawaldeh”), alleging that Khawaldeh violated Sream’s 6 rights under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1116, 1125(a), (c), and (d), and Cal. Bus & Prof. § 17200 7 et seq. (“Action”); 8 9 10 11 B. The Parties entered into a settlement agreement as of March 2016 (“Settlement Agreement”), which requires entry of the stipulated judgment set forth herein; And good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 12 1. That judgment be entered in favor of Sream against Khawaldeh on all claims. 13 2. For the purposes of binding preclusive effect on Khawaldeh as to future 14 disputes between Khawaldeh and Sream, and only for such purposes, Khawaldeh admits 15 the following: 16 a. Mr. Martin Birzle is now, and has been at all times since the dates of issuance, 17 the owner of United States Trademark Registration Nos. 2,235,638; 2,307,176; 18 and 3,675,839 (the “RooR Marks”) and of all rights thereto and thereunder. 19 b. The RooR Marks are valid and enforceable. 20 c. Since at least 2013, Plaintiff Sream has been the exclusive licensee of the 21 RooR Marks in the United States. Mr. Birzle has been granted all 22 enforcement rights to Sream to sue for obtain injunctive and monetary relief 23 for past and future infringement of the RooR Marks. d. Khawaldeh, by the actions described in the complaint, has infringed upon the 24 RooR Marks. 25 26 3. Khawaldeh, and those acting on Khawaldeh’s behalf (including its owners, 27 shareholders, principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, independent contractors, and 28 partners), are permanently enjoined from producing, manufacturing, distributing, selling, 3 JUDGMENT 1 offer for sale, advertising, promoting, licensing, or marketing (a) any product bearing the 2 RooR Marks or (b) any design, mark, or feature that is confusingly similar to the RooR 3 Marks (collectively, the “Injunction”). 4 4. Khawaldeh is bound by the Injunction regardless of whether Mr. Martin Birzle 5 assigns or licenses its intellectual property rights to another for so long as such trademark 6 rights are subsisting, valid, and enforceable. The Injunction inures to the benefit of Mr. 7 Martin Birzle’s successors, assignees, and licensees. 8 9 5. This Court (or if this Court is unavailable, any court within the Central District of California) shall retain jurisdiction over all disputes between and among the Parties 10 arising out of the Settlement Agreement and Injunction, the Stipulation which includes the 11 Injunction, and this final judgment, including but not limited to interpretation and 12 enforcement of the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 13 14 6. The Parties waive any rights to appeal this stipulated judgment, including without limitation the Injunction. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 Dated: April 5, 2016 20 MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?