Sream, Inc. v. Julio Torres, et al.
Filing
56
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT JULIO TORRES by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. IT IS ORDERED that the parties stipulated to a settlement agreement. Torres and those acting on Torres behalf are enjoined from producing, man ufacturing, distributing, selling, offer for sale, advertising, promoting, licensing, or marketing any project bearing RooR marks or any design, mark or feature that is confusingly similar to the RooR marks. See order for further details. Related to: Stipulation for Permanent Injunction 55 . (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (shb)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SREAM, INC, a California corporation,
12
13
Case No. 5:16-cv-00342-RSWL-DTB
Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew
Plaintiff,
v.
14
15
JULIO TORRES, et al.,
16
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT JULIO
TORRES
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
JUDGMENT
1
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
2
This Court, having made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law
3
4
pursuant to the parties’ stipulation:
A.
Plaintiff Sream, Inc. (“Sream” or “Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendant Julio
5
Torres (“Torres”), alleging that Torres violated Sream’s rights under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114,
6
1116, 1125(a), (c), and (d), and Cal. Bus & Prof. § 17200 et seq. (“Action”);
7
8
9
10
B.
The Parties entered into a settlement agreement as of February 16, 2017
(“Settlement Agreement”), which requires entry of the stipulated judgment set forth herein;
And good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
AND DECREED THAT:
11
1.
That judgment be entered in favor of Sream against Torres on all claims.
12
2.
For the purposes of binding preclusive effect on Torres as to future disputes
13
between Torres and Sream, and only for such purposes, Torres admits the following:
14
a. Mr. Martin Birzle is now, and has been at all times since the dates of issuance,
15
the owner of United States Trademark Registration Nos. 2,235,638; 2,307,176;
16
and 3,675,839 (the “RooR Marks”) and of all rights thereto and thereunder.
17
b. The RooR Marks are valid and enforceable.
18
c. Since at least 2013, Plaintiff Sream has been the exclusive licensee of the
19
RooR Marks in the United States. Mr. Birzle has been granted all
20
enforcement rights to Sream to sue for obtain injunctive and monetary relief
21
for past and future infringement of the RooR Marks.
d. Torres, by the actions described in the complaint, has infringed upon the RooR
22
Marks.
23
24
3.
Torres, and those acting on Torres’s behalf (including its owners,
25
shareholders, principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, independent contractors, and
26
partners), are permanently enjoined from producing, manufacturing, distributing, selling,
27
offer for sale, advertising, promoting, licensing, or marketing (a) any product bearing the
28
2
JUDGMENT
1
RooR Marks or (b) any design, mark, or feature that is confusingly similar to the RooR
2
Marks (collectively, the “Injunction”).
3
4.
Torres is bound by the Injunction regardless of whether Mr. Martin Birzle
4
assigns or licenses its intellectual property rights to another for so long as such trademark
5
rights are subsisting, valid, and enforceable. The Injunction inures to the benefit of Mr.
6
Martin Birzle’s successors, assignees, and licensees.
7
5.
This Court (or if this Court is unavailable, any court within the Central District
8
of California) shall retain jurisdiction over all disputes between and among the Parties
9
arising out of the Settlement Agreement and Injunction, the Stipulation which includes the
10
Injunction, and this final judgment, including but not limited to interpretation and
11
enforcement of the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
12
6.
The Parties waive any rights to appeal this stipulated judgment, including
13
without limitation the Injunction.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
Dated: 2/16/17
16
17
s/ RONALD S.W. LEW
Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew
United States District Court Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?