Benjamin Van Haastert v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

Filing 26

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 25 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Benjamin Van Haastert JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 BENJAMIN VAN HAASTERT, an individual Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 vs. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, Defendants. No. 5:16-CV-00426-MWF-(JEMx) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Dept.: Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald 5A Complaint Filed: June 22, 2015 Trial Date: April 24, 2018 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. C.D. CAL. NO. 5:16-CV-00426-MWF-(JEMX) LEGAL_US_W # 92451558.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH 3 PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 6 Dated: January 10, 2018. Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. C.D. CAL. NO. 5:16-CV-00426-MWF-(JEMX) LEGAL_US_W # 92451558.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?