Crockett L. Howard et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al

Filing 36

JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court having ordered that the complaint be dismissed and Plaintiffs having failed to amend their complaint in the time allowed by the Court, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs take nothing, that the action be dismissed with prejudice, and that Defendants recover their costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1920. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WELLS FARGO HOME
)
MORTGAGE; CLEAR RECON
)
CORP.; MORTGAGE
)
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEM, INC., and DOES 1 through )
)
10 inclusively
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________ )
CROCKETT L. HOWARD and
RHONDA HOWARD,

Case No.: EDCV 16-518 DSF (KKx)

JUDGMENT

20
21

The Court having ordered that the complaint be dismissed and Plaintiffs

22

having failed to amend their complaint in the time allowed by the Court,

23

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs take nothing, that the action

24

be dismissed with prejudice, and that Defendants recover their costs of suit

25

pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

26
27
28

Dated: August 11, 2016

____________________________
Dale S. Fischer
United States District Judge