Chris Anthony George v. Raymond Madden

Filing 61

ORDER RE: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. Upon review of the parties' arguments, the Court DENIES the Petition 1 for the following reasons: (1) the facts and evidence indicate that Petitioner made the decision to go to trial on his own volition; (2) Petitioner has failed to provide evidence showing that Attorney Davitt's advice was ungrounded or otherwise u nreasonable; (3) Petitioner has failed to show that Attorney Davitt provided false, misleading, or otherwise inaccurate information to him. While in hindsight, Attorney Davitt's advice led to a negative outcome for Petitioner, this alone does not constitute adequate grounds for prevailing on a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. (wr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS ANTHONY GEORGE, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff(s), vs. RAYMOND MADDEN, Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:16-cv-01016-RGK-AJW ORDER RE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 16 17 Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus on the ground of ineffective assistance of 18 counsel. Upon review of the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES the Petition for the 19 following reasons: (1) the facts and evidence indicate that Petitioner made the decision to go to 20 trial on his own volition; (2) Petitioner has failed to provide evidence showing that Attorney 21 Davitt’s advice was ungrounded or otherwise unreasonable; (3) Petitioner has failed to show that 22 Attorney Davitt provided false, misleading, or otherwise inaccurate information to him. While 23 in hindsight, Attorney Davitt’s advice led to a negative outcome for Petitioner, this alone does 24 not constitute adequate grounds for prevailing on a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 8, 2018 R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?