Ted Shimono v Harbor Freight tools USA, Inc et al
Filing
53
ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) #52 , the Court hereby DISMISSES this action WITH PREJUDICE as to Plaintiff Shimono's individual claims and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Plaintiff Shimono's class action claims, if any. (gk)
1
5
LAW OFFICES OF
RONALD A. MARRON
RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 175650)
ron@consumersadvocates.com
MICHAEL T. HOUCHIN (SBN 305541)
mike@consumersadvocates.com
651 Arroyo Drive
San Diego, California 92103
Telephone: (619) 696-9006
Facsimile: (619) 564-6665
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TED SHIMONO, on behalf of himself, all )
others similarly situated, and the general )
public,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA,
)
INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:16-cv-01052 CAS (MRWx)
CLASS ACTION
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Judge:
Hon. Christina A. Snyder
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1Case No. 5:16-cv-01052-CAS-MRx
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
1
Presently before the Court is the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of
2
Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Having read
3
and considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation, and for good cause appearing, the
4
Court hereby DISMISSES this action WITH PREJUDICE as to Plaintiff
5
Shimono's individual claims and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Plaintiff
6
Shimono's class action claims, if any.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED:
9
10
11
12
13
Dated: May 16, 2017
_____ ______________________
Hon. Christina A. Snyder
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
Case No. 5:16-cv-01052-CAS-MRx
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?